Surface waves in the ocean respond to variability and changes of climate. Observations and modeling studies indicate trends in wave height over the past decades. Nevertheless, it is currently impossible to discern whether these trends are the result of climate variability or change. The output of an Earth system model (EC-EARTH) produced within phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) is used here to force a global Wave Model (WAM) in order to study the response of waves to different climate regimes. A control simulation was run to determine the natural (unforced) model variability. A simplified fingerprint approach was used to calculate positive and negative limits of natural variability for wind speed and significant wave height, which were then compared to different (forced) climate regimes over the historical period (1850–2010) and in the future climate change scenario RCP8.5 (2010–2100). Detectable climate change signals were found in the current decade (2010–20) in the North Atlantic, equatorial Pacific, and Southern Ocean. Until the year 2060, climate change signals are detectable in 60% of the global ocean area. The authors show that climate change acts to generate detectable trends in wind speed and significant wave height that exceed the positive and the negative ranges of natural variability in different regions of the ocean. Moreover, in more than 3% of the ocean area, the climate change signal is reversible such that trends exceeded both positive and negative limits of natural variability at different points in time. These changes are attributed to local (due to local wind) and remote (due to swell) factors.
Detection and Attribution of Climate Change Signal in Ocean Wind Waves
Authors:
Mikhail DobryninAffiliationsInstitute of Oceanography, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Germany Jens MurawskiAffiliations
Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark Johanna BaehrAffiliations
Institute of Oceanography, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Germany Tatiana IlyinaAffiliations
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
AMS Single Sign-On Log In
If you have a subscription to the AMS Journals Online content, please click here to login via the AMS single sign-on page and gain access to this content.
If you are interested in Pay Per View or want to log in as an institutional admin, please use the login area below.
Your Access Options
Log In
If you have an individual subscription to this content, or if you have purchased this content through Pay Per Article within the past 24 hours, you can gain access by logging in with your username and password here:
Purchase
February 2015
Share this Article
Featured Collections
Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) -BAMS, JAMC,MWR, WAF
LatMix -BAMS, JPO, JTECH
PANDOWAE -MWR, JAS, WAF, JTECH
Most Read (past 12 months)
-
Why Tropical Sea Surface Temperature is Insensitive to Ocean Heat Transport ChangesKoll et al.September 2013, Vol. 26, No. 18
-
Winter and Summer Northern Hemisphere Blocking in CMIP5 ModelsMasato et al.September 2013, Vol. 26, No. 18
-
Externally Forced and Internally Generated Decadal Climate Variability Associated with the Interdecadal Pacific OscillationMeehl et al.September 2013, Vol. 26, No. 18
-
A Decomposition of Feedback Contributions to Polar Warming AmplificationTaylor et al.September 2013, Vol. 26, No. 18
-
Detection and Attribution of Observed Changes in Northern Hemisphere Spring Snow CoverRupp et al.September 2013, Vol. 26, No. 18
-
Influence of Local Dynamical Air–Sea Feedback Process on the Hawaiian Lee CountercurrentSasaki et al.September 2013, Vol. 26, No. 18
Most Cited (past 12 months)
-
An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for ClimateReynolds et al.July 2002, Vol. 15, No. 13
-
Improved Global Sea Surface Temperature Analyses Using Optimum InterpolationReynolds et al.June 1994, Vol. 7, No. 6
-
Improvements to NOAA’s Historical Merged Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis (1880–2006)Smith et al.May 2008, Vol. 21, No. 10
-
Annular Modes in the Extratropical Circulation. Part I: Month-to-Month VariabilityThompson et al.March 2000, Vol. 13, No. 5
-
Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global WarmingHeld et al.November 2006, Vol. 19, No. 21
-
The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3)Collins et al.June 2006, Vol. 19, No. 11