Researcher Portfolio
Wang, Zhong
Nano-Systems from Ions, Spins and Electrons, Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics, Max Planck Society
Researcher Profile
Position: Nano-Systems from Ions, Spins and Electrons, Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics, Max Planck Society
Additional IDs: ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-9781
Researcher ID: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons260829
Publications
(1 - 25 of 84)
: Gradwohl, N., Neth, H., Giese, H., & Gaissmaier, W. (2024). Explicit discrimination and ingroup favoritism, but no implicit biases in hypothetical triage decisions during COVID-19. Scientific Reports, 14(1): 1213. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50385-w. [PubMan] : Schulze, C., Gaissmaier, W., & Newell, B. R. (2020). Maximizing as satisficing: On pattern matching and probability maximizing in groups and individuals. Cognition, 205: 104382. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104382. [PubMan] : Popovic, N. F., Bentele, U. U., Pruessner, J. C., Moussaïd, M., & Gaissmaier, W. (2020). Acute stress reduces the social amplification of risk perception. Scientific Reports, 10: 7845. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62399-9. [PubMan] : Giese, H., Neth, H., Moussaïd, M., Betsch, C., & Gaissmaier, W. (2020). The echo in flu-vaccination echo chambers: Selective attention trumps social influence. Vaccine, 38(8), 2070-2076. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.038. [PubMan] : Kause, A., Townsend, T., & Gaissmaier, W. (2019). Framing climate uncertainty: Frame choices reveal and influence climate change beliefs. Weather, Climate, and Society, 11(1), 199-215. doi:10.1175/wcas-d-18-0002.1. [PubMan] : Popovic, N. F., Pachur, T., & Gaissmaier, W. (2019). The gap between medical and monetary choices under risk persists in decisions for others. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(4), 388-402. doi:10.1002/bdm.2121. [PubMan] : Gaissmaier, W., Giese, H., Galesic, M., Garcia-Retamero, R., Kasper, J., Kleiter, I., Meuth, S. G., Köpke, S., & Heesen, C. (2018). Numeracy of multiple sclerosis patients: A comparison of patients from the PERCEPT study to a German probabilistic sample. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(1), 74-78. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.018. [PubMan] : Hoffmann, J. A., Gaissmaier, W., & von Helversen, B. (2017). Justifying the judgment process affects neither judgment accuracy, nor. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(6), 627-641. [PubMan] : Donner-Banzhoff, N., Seidel, J., Sikeler, A. M., Bösner, S., Vogelmeier, M., Westram, A., Feufel, M., Gaissmaier, W., Wegwarth, O., & Gigerenzer, G. (2017). The phenomenology of the diagnostic process: A primary-care based survey. Medical Decision Making, 37(1), 27-34. doi:10.1177/0272989X16653401. [PubMan] : Phillips, N. D., Neth, H., Woike, J. K., & Gaissmaier, W. (2017). FFTrees: A toolbox to create, visualize, and evaluate fast-and-frugal decision trees. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(4), 344-368. [PubMan] : Galesic, M., Kause, A., & Gaissmaier, W. (2016). A sampling framework for uncertainty in individual environmental decisions. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 242-258. doi:10.1111/tops.12172. [PubMan] : Gaissmaier, W., & Neth, H. (2016). Die Intelligenz einfacher Entscheidungsregeln in einer ungewissen Welt. Controller Magazin, 41(2), 19-26. [PubMan] : Gaissmaier, W., Wilke, A., Scheibehenne, B., McGanney, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2016). Betting on illusory patterns: Probability matching in habitual gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(1), 143-156. doi:10.1007/s10899-015-9539-9. [PubMan] : Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Intuition und Führung: Wie gute Entscheidungen entstehen. In M. W. Fröse, S. Kaudela-Baum, & F. E. P. Dievernich (Eds. ), Emotion und Intuition in Führung und Organisation (pp. 19-42). Wiesbaden: Springer. [PubMan] : Bodemer, N., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Risk perception. In H. Cho, T. O. Reimer, & K. A. McComas (Eds. ), The SAGE handbook of risk communication (pp. 10-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [PubMan] : Moussaïd, M., Brighton, H., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). The amplification of risk in experimental diffusion chains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(18), 5631-5636. doi:10.1073/pnas.1421883112. [PubMan] : Monteiro, S. D., Sherbino, J. D., Ilgen, J. S., Dore, K. L., Wood, T. J., Young, M. E., Bandiera, G., Blouin, D., Gaissmaier, W., Norman, G. R., & Howey, E. (2015). Disrupting diagnostic reasoning: The effect of interruptions on the diagnostic performance of residents and emergency physicians. Academic Medicine, 90(4), 511-517. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000614. [PubMan] : Oertelt-Prigione, S., Seeland, U., Kendel, F., Rücke, M., Flöel, A., Gaissmaier, W., Heim, C., Schnabel, R., Stangl, V., & Regitz-Zagrosek, V. (2015). Cardiovascular risk factor distribution and subjective risk estimation in urban women (BEFRI study): A randomized cross-sectional study. BMC Medicine, 13: 52. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0304-9. [PubMan] : Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Die Kunst der guten Entscheidung: In einer unsicheren Welt brauchen wir Kopf und Bauch. In Die Vermessung des Risikos (pp. 166-177). Frankfurt am Main: Union Investment. [PubMan] : Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Decision making: Nonrational theories. In J. D. Wright (Ed. ), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 911-916). Oxford: Elsevier. [PubMan] : Hautz, W. E., Kämmer, J. E., Schauber, S. K., Spies, C. D., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Diagnostic performance by medical students working individually or in teams. JAMA, 313(3), 303-304. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15770. [PubMan] : Kause, A., Prinz, R., Gaissmaier, W., & Wegwarth, O. (2014). Risikokompetenz von Ärzten und Patienten. In K. Hurrelmann, & E. Baumann (Eds. ), Handbuch Gesundheitskommunikation (pp. 424-439). Bern: Huber. [PubMan] : Norman, G., Sherbino, J., Dore, K., Wood, T., Young, M., Gaissmaier, W., Kreuger, S., & Monteiro, S. (2014). The etiology of diagnostic errors: A controlled trial of system 1 versus system 2 reasoning. Academic Medicine, 89,2, 277-284. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000105. [PubMan] : Gaissmaier, W., Anderson, B. L., & Schulkin, J. (2014). How do physicians provide statistical information about antidepressants to hypothetical patients? Medical Decision Making, 34(2), 206-215. doi:10.1177/0272989X13501720. [PubMan] : Kämmer, J. E., Gaissmaier, W., Reimer, T., & Schermuly, C. C. (2014). The adaptive use of recognition in group decision making. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 911-942. doi:10.1111/cogs.12110. [PubMan]