Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
 Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht
  View-based vs. place-based navigation: What is recognized in recognition-triggered responses?

Mallot, H., & Gillner, S.(1998). View-based vs. place-based navigation: What is recognized in recognition-triggered responses? (64). Tübingen, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics.

Item is

 

einblenden: alle ausblenden: alle

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Datensatz-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E7EB-C Versions-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-8E47-F
Genre: Bericht

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
MPIK-TR-64.pdf (Verlagsversion), 434KB
Öffnen   Speichern
Datei-Permalink:
https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-8E48-E
Name:
MPIK-TR-64.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Öffnen
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Mallot, HA1, 2, Autor           
Gillner, S, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: The usage of landmark information in a route navigation task is investigated
in a virtual environment. After learning a route, subjects were released at
intermediate points along the route and asked to indicate the next movement
direction required to continue the route. At each decision point, three
landmarks were present, one of which was viewed centrally and two which
appeared in the periphery of the visual field when approaching the decision
point. Replacement of the landmarks in the test phase did not affect subjects'
performance as long as the direction informations associated with each
landmark and landmark position (left, central, right) during the learning
phase were consistent. Only if landmarks were combined that carried
conflicting movement informations, a reduced performance is observed. We
conclude that local views and objects are recognized individually and that the
associated directions are combined in a voting scheme. No evidence was found
for a recognition of places as panoramic views or configurations of objects.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 1998-10
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: 12
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Tübingen, Germany : Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: Reportnr.: 64
BibTex Citekey: 1532
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Genre der Quelle: Reihe
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 64 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -