Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
 ZurückNächste 
  When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets?

Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2005). When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets? Perception and Psychophysics, 67(5), 897-909. doi:10.3758/BF03193542.

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Wühr, Peter1, Autor           
Müsseler, Jochen2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634564              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Three experiments investigated whether the repeated-letter inferiority effect (RLIE) and repetition blindness (RB) are identical phenomena or not and how the RLIE can be reconciled with the flanker compatibility effect (FCE). Participants reported a masked target and ignored an unmasked distractor. We manipulated the type of distractor (identical, alternative target, or neutral), the order of presenting distractor and target, and the predictability of target location. When distractors preceded the targets, distractors identical to the target always caused deficits in target processing (i.e., RB). With simultaneous presentation, identical distractors caused deficits (i.e., an RLIE) for unpredictable target locations only. Yet the RLIE was significantly smaller than RB. This result suggests that simultaneously presented stimuli are identified serially, in random order, if target position is unpredictable. As a result, RB arises only in the 50% of all trials with identical distractors in which the distractor is identified before the target. With simultaneous presentation and predictable target location, however, parallel processing of targets and distractors was possible that gave rise to an FCE in recognition accuracy. Analyses of false alarm rates revealed no evidence of significant response biases.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2005
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: eDoc: 277996
Anderer: P5631
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193542
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Perception and Psychophysics
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Austin, Tex., etc. : Psychonomic Society, etc.
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 67 (5) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 897 - 909 Identifikator: ISSN: 0031-5117
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925432372