Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: ‘What experimental data can tell us?’

Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: ‘What experimental data can tell us?’. Journal of Child Language, 33(3), 519-557. doi:10.1017/S0305000906007513.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Ambridge, Rowland, Theakston & Tomasello (2006).pdf (Verlagsversion), 194KB
Name:
Ambridge, Rowland, Theakston & Tomasello (2006).pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Ambridge, Ben1, Autor
Rowland, Caroline F.1, Autor           
Theakston, Anna L.2, Autor
Tomasello, Michael3, Autor
Affiliations:
1University of Liverpool, ou_persistent22              
2University of Manchester, ou_persistent22              
3Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: This study investigated different accounts of children's acquisition of non-subject wh-questions. Questions using each of 4 wh-words (what, who, how and why), and 3 auxiliaries (BE, DO and CAN) in 3sg and 3pl form were elicited from 28 children aged 3;6–4;6. Rates of non-inversion error (Who she is hitting?) were found not to differ by wh-word, auxiliary or number alone, but by lexical auxiliary subtype and by wh-word+lexical auxiliary combination. This finding counts against simple rule-based accounts of question acquisition that include no role for the lexical subtype of the auxiliary, and suggests that children may initially acquire wh-word+lexical auxiliary combinations from the input. For DO questions, auxiliary-doubling errors (What does she does like?) were also observed, although previous research has found that such errors are virtually non-existent for positive questions. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2006
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1017/S0305000906007513
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Journal of Child Language
  Andere : J. Child Lang.
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: London : Cambridge University Press.
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 33 (3) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 519 - 557 Identifikator: ISSN: 0305-0009
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925341743