English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Prosodic breaks in sentence processing investigated by event-related potentials

Bögels, S., Schriefers, H. J., Vonk, W., & Chwilla, D. (2011). Prosodic breaks in sentence processing investigated by event-related potentials. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 424-440. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00291.x.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Boegels_2011_Lang_and_Lin_Compass_Prosodic Breaks in Sentence Processing.pdf (Publisher version), 359KB
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Boegels_2011_Lang_and_Lin_Compass_Prosodic Breaks in Sentence Processing.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Bögels, Sara1, Author           
Schriefers , Herbert J.1, Author
Vonk, Wietske2, Author           
Chwilla, Dorothee1, Author
Affiliations:
1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, ou_persistent22              
2Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_55201              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Prosodic breaks (PBs) can indicate a sentence’s syntactic structure. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) are an excellent way to study auditory sentence processing, since they provide an on-line measure across a complete sentence, in contrast to other on- and off-line methods. ERPs for the first time allowed investigating the processing of a PB itself. PBs reliably elicit a closure positive shift (CPS). We first review several studies on the CPS, leading to the conclusion that it is elicited by abstract structuring or phrasing of the input. Then we review ERP findings concerning the role of PBs in sentence processing as indicated by ERP components like the N400, P600 and LAN. We focus on whether and how PBs can (help to) disambiguate locally ambiguous sentences. Differences in results between different studies can be related to differences in items, initial parsing preferences and tasks. Finally, directions for future research are discussed.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20112011
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00291.x
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language and Linguistics Compass
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 5 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 424 - 440 Identifier: ISSN: 1749-818X