English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Call type signals caller goal: A new take on ultimate and proximate influences in vocal production

Schamberg, I., Wittig, R. M., & Crockford, C. (2018). Call type signals caller goal: A new take on ultimate and proximate influences in vocal production. Biological Reviews, 93(4), 2071-2082. doi:10.1111/brv.12437.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Schamberg_Call-type-signals_BiolRev_2018_Proofs.pdf (Any fulltext), 3MB
Name:
Schamberg_Call-type-signals_BiolRev_2018_Proofs.pdf
Description:
Proof-Version
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Schamberg, Isaac1, Author           
Wittig, Roman M.2, Author           
Crockford, Catherine2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society, ou_1497674              
2Chimpanzees, Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society, ou_2149636              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: vocal production, call diversity, animal communication, communication goals, chimpanzee
 Abstract: After 40 years of debate it remains unclear whether signallers produce vocalizations in order to provide receivers with information about call context or external stimuli. This has led some researchers to propose that call production is arousal‐ or affect‐based. Although arousal influences certain acoustic parameters within a call type, we argue that it cannot explain why individuals across vertebrates produce different call types. Given emerging evidence that calls are goal‐based, we argue that call type is a signal of a caller's goal to elicit a change in receiver behaviour. Using chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) as case studies, we demonstrate the two benefits of viewing call production as signalling both caller goal (which determines call type) and caller arousal (which affects within‐call‐type variation). Such a framework can explain first, why a single class of calls is apparently given in multiple contexts, and, second, why some species have larger call repertoires than others. Previous studies have noted links between sociality and repertoire size, but have not specified exactly why animals living in societies that are more complex might require a greater number of differentiated signals. The caller‐goal framework potentially clarifies how social complexity might favour call diversification. As social complexity increases, callers may need to elicit a larger number of distinct behaviours from a wider range of distinct audiences.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2018-06-122018-11
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 12
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1111/brv.12437
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show hide
Project name : ApeAttachment
Grant ID : 679787
Funding program : Horizon 2020 (H2020)
Funding organization : European Commission (EC)

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Biological Reviews
  Other : Biol. Rev.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 93 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 2071 - 2082 Identifier: ISSN: 1464-7931