Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Classifier categories reflect, but do not affect conceptual organization

Speed, L., Chen, J., Huettig, F., & Majid, A. (2021). Classifier categories reflect, but do not affect conceptual organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 625-640. doi:10.1037/xlm0000967.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Speed_etal_2021_Classifier categories reflect but....pdf (Verlagsversion), 437KB
Name:
Speed_etal_2021_Classifier categories reflect but....pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Speed, Laura1, Autor
Chen, Jidong2, Autor
Huettig, Falk3, 4, Autor           
Majid, Asifa5, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Center for Language Studies, External Organizations, ou_55238              
2California State University, Fresno, CA, USA, ou_persistent22              
3Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792545              
4Radboud University Nijmegen, External Organizations, ou_3055479              
5University of York, York, UK, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: classifiers, linguistic relativity; language and thought; object concepts; Mandarin; Dutch
 Zusammenfassung: Do we structure object-related conceptual information according to real-world sensorimotor experience, or can it also be shaped by linguistic information? This study investigates whether a feature of language coded in grammar—numeral classifiers—affects the conceptual representation of objects. We compared speakers of Mandarin (a classifier language) with speakers of Dutch (a language without classifiers) on how they judged object similarity in four studies. In the first three studies, participants had to rate how similar a target object was to four comparison objects, one of which shared a classifier with the target. Objects were presented as either words or pictures. Overall, the target object was always rated as most similar to the object with the shared classifier, but this was the case regardless of the language of the participant. In a final study employing a successive pile-sorting task, we also found that the underlying object concepts were similar for speakers of Mandarin and Dutch. Speakers of a non-classifier language are therefore sensitive to the same conceptual similarities that underlie classifier systems in a classifier language. Classifier systems may therefore reflect conceptual structure, rather than shape it.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2020-08-182020-11-052021-05
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000967
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 47 (4) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 625 - 640 Identifikator: ISSN: 0278-7393
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954927606766