English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Sex ratio and density affect sexual selection in a sex-role reversed fish

Aronsen, T., Berglund, A., Mobley, K. B., Ratikainen, I. I., & Rosenqvist, G. (2013). Sex ratio and density affect sexual selection in a sex-role reversed fish. Evolution, 67(11), 3243-3257. doi:10.1111/evo.12201.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Aronsen_2013.pdf (Publisher version), 467KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Aronsen_2013.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, MPLM; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Aronsen, Tonje, Author
Berglund, Anders, Author
Mobley, Kenyon B.1, Author           
Ratikainen, Irja I., Author
Rosenqvist, Gunilla, Author
Affiliations:
1Department Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society, ou_1445634              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: bateman’s principles; intrasexual competition; mating system; operational sex ratio; Syngnathus typhle
 Abstract: Understanding how demographic processes influence mating systems is important to decode ecological influences on sexual selection in nature.We manipulated sex ratio and density in experimental populations of the sex-role reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. We quantified sexual selection using the Bateman gradient (β ss), the opportunity for selection (I), and sexual selection (Is), and the maximum standardized sexual selection differential (s max).We also measured selection on body length using standardized selection differentials (s) and mating differentials (m), and tested whether the observed I and Is differ from values obtained by simulating random mating. We found that I, Is, and s max, but not β ss, were higher for females under female than male bias and the opposite for males, but density did not affect these measures. However, higher density decreased sexual selection (m but not s) on female length, but selection on body length was not affected by sex ratio. Finally, Is but not I was higher than expected from random mating, and only for females under female bias. This study demonstrates that both sex ratio and density affect sexual selection and that disentangling interrelated demographic processes is essential to a more complete understanding of mating behavior and the evolution of mating systems.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2012-11-272013-06-132013-07-262013-11
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Evolution
  Other : Evolution
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Boulder, Colo.? : Society for the Study of Evolution
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 67 (11) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 3243 - 3257 Identifier: ISSN: 0014-3820 (print)
ISSN: 1558-5646 (online)
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/991042730870254