English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production

Vromans, R. D., & Jongman, S. R. (2018). The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production. PLoS One, 13(5): e0197313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197313.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
journal.pone.0197313.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
Name:
journal.pone.0197313.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2018
Copyright Info:
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributio n License, which permits unrestricte d use, distribu tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Data available (link to Figshare) (Supplementary material)
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Vromans, Ruben D.1, Author
Jongman, Suzanne R.2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Tilburg center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
2Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792545              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The present study investigated the interplay between selective inhibition (the ability to suppress specific competing responses) and nonselective inhibition (the ability to suppress any inappropriate response) during single word production. To this end, we combined two well-established research paradigms: the picture-word interference task and the stop-signal task. Selective inhibition was assessed by instructing participants to name target pictures (e.g., dog) in the presence of semantically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated (e.g., window) distractor words. Nonselective inhibition was tested by occasionally presenting a visual stop-signal, indicating that participants should withhold their verbal response. The stop-signal was presented early (250 ms) aimed at interrupting the lexical selection stage, and late (325 ms) to influence the word-encoding stage of the speech production process. We found longer naming latencies for pictures with semantically related distractors than with unrelated distractors (semantic interference effect). The results further showed that, at both delays, stopping latencies (i.e., stop-signal RTs) were prolonged for naming pictures with semantically related distractors compared to pictures with unrelated distractors. Taken together, our findings suggest that selective and nonselective inhibition, at least partly, share a common inhibitory mechanism during different stages of the speech production process.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2017-09-092018-04-292018-05-10
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197313
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: PLoS One
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 13 (5) Sequence Number: e0197313 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1932-6203
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1000000000277850