hide
Free keywords:
-
Abstract:
The dissociation between object identity and object orientation observed in six patients with brain damage, has been taken as evidence for a
view-invariant model of object recognition. However, there was also some indication that these patients were not generally agnosic for object orientation but
were able to gain access to at least some information about objects' canonical upright. We studied a new case (KB) with spared knowledge of object identity
and impaired perception of object orientation using a Forced choice paradigm to contrast directly the patient's ability to perceive objects' canonical upright vs
non-upright orientations. We presented 2D-pictures of objects with unambiguous canonical upright orientations in four different orientations (0 degrees, -90
degrees, +90 degrees, 180 degrees). KB showed no impairment in identifying letters, objects, animals, or faces irrespective of their given orientation. Also, her
knowledge of upright orientation of stimuli was perfectly preserved. In sharp contrast, KB was not able to judge the orientation when the stimuli were presented
in a non-upright orientation. The findings give further support for a distributed view-based representation of objects in which neurons become tuned to the
features present in certain views of an object. Since we see more upright than inverted animals and familiar objects, the statistics of these images leads to a
larger number of neurons tuned for objects in an upright orientation. We suppose that probably for this reason KB's knowledge of upright orientation was found
to be more robust against neuronal damage than knowledge of other orientations, (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
