Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
 Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht
  First Impressions are More Important than Early Intervention. Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the Lab

Beckenkamp, M., Engel, C., Glöckner, A., Irlenbusch, B., Hennig-Schmidt, H., Kube, S., et al. (2009). First Impressions are More Important than Early Intervention. Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the Lab.

Item is

 

einblenden: alle ausblenden: alle

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Datensatz-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0028-6CB3-9 Versions-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0029-4BA7-B
Genre: Forschungspapier

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1432393 (beliebiger Volltext)
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
externe Referenz:
http://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2009_21online.pdf (Preprint)
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Beckenkamp, Martin1, Autor           
Engel, Christoph1, Autor           
Glöckner, Andreas1, Autor           
Irlenbusch, Bernd1, Autor           
Hennig-Schmidt, Heike1, Autor           
Kube, Sebastian1, Autor           
Kurschilgen, Michael1, Autor           
Morell, Alexander1, Autor           
Nicklisch, Andreas1, Autor           
Normann, Hans-Theo1, Autor           
Towfigh, Emanuel Vahid1, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Society, ou_2173688              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Broken Windows: the metaphor has changed New York and Los Angeles. Yet it is far from undisputed whether the broken windows policy was causal for reducing crime. In a series of lab experiments we put two components of the theory to the test. We show that first impressions and early punishment of antisocial behaviour are independently and jointly causal for cooperativeness. The effect of good first impressions and of early vigilance cannot be explained with, but adds to, participants’ initial level of benevolence. Mere impression management is not strong enough to maintain cooperation. Cooperation stabilizes if good first impressions are combined with some risk of sanctions. Yet if we control for first impressions, early vigilance only has a small effect. The effect vanishes over time.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2009
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Bonn : Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: Anderer: 2009/21
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle

einblenden: