English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study

Landler, L., Ruxton, G. D., & Malkemper, E. P. (2020). Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study. Biology Open, 9(6): bio049866. doi:10.1242/bio.049866.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
bio049866.full.pdf (Any fulltext), 544KB
Name:
bio049866.full.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Not specified
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2020
Copyright Info:
Copyright owner: The author s. under https://journals.biologists.com/bio/pages/rights-permissions

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Landler, Lukas1, Author
Ruxton, Graeme D., Author
Malkemper, E. Pascal2, Author           
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Max Planck Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Max Planck Society, ou_3169318              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Circular statistics, AIC, Rayleigh test, Hermans-Rasson test
 Abstract: Many studies in biology involve data measured on a circular scale. Such data require different statistical treatment from those measured on linear scales. The most common statistical exploration of circular data involves testing the null hypothesis that the data show no aggregation and are instead uniformly distributed over the whole circle. The most common means of performing this type of investigation is with a Rayleigh test. An alternative might be to compare the fit of the uniform distribution model to alternative models. Such model-fitting approaches have become a standard technique with linear data, and their greater application to circular data has been recently advocated. Here we present simulation data that demonstrate that such model-based inference can offer very similar performance to the best traditional tests, but only if adjustment is made in order to control type I error rate.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2020-06-23
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 4
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1242/bio.049866
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Biology Open
  Abbreviation : Biol Open
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Cambridge : The Company of Biologists
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 9 (6) Sequence Number: bio049866 Start / End Page: - Identifier: Other: 2046-6390
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2046-6390