English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Coexisting overwintering strategies in Daphnia pulex: Clonal differences in sexual reproduction

Lampert, W., Lampert, K. P., & Larsson, P. (2012). Coexisting overwintering strategies in Daphnia pulex: Clonal differences in sexual reproduction. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 179(4), 281-291. doi:10.1127/1863-9135/2012/0202.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
s4.pdf (Publisher version), 595KB
Name:
s4.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Lampert, Winfried1, Author           
Lampert, Kathrin P., Author
Larsson, Petter2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Emeritus Group Lampert, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society, ou_1445636              
2Department Ecophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society, ou_976547              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: clones; dual reproduction mode; pathenogenetic females; dormant embryos; ephippia production; fertilization efficiency
 Abstract: Using two sets of clones of Daphnia pulex derived from overwintering parthenogenetic females and
neonates hatched from dormant embryos, we tested for a genetic basis of differing overwintering strategies. While
in an earlier study we had tested if the two clonal groups differed with respect to their growth rates, which would
give them different opportunities during the spring development, we now performed experiments on possible differences
in traits related to sexual reproduction (i.e., male production and ephippia formation). Our working hypothesis
was that clones isolated from the sediment egg bank show a greater tendency to reproduce sexually than
females overwintering in the open water. Although individual clones showed large differences in the proportion of
males among offspring under short-day conditions (zero to > 40 %), the clonal groups did not differ significantly.
Ephippia production was also significantly different among clones, but due to the large variances the group means
did not differ. Ephippia production and male production in individual clones were not correlated, hence the tendencies
to produce males or ephippia varied independently. Although there were considerable differences in the mean
reproductive characteristics between the groups, the low power of the tests prevented support of any of the hypotheses.
Rather, it seems that there is incomplete temporal differentiation while some females may follow a mixed
strategy implying the production of sexual eggs as insurance against catastrophic events and successive attempts to
survive the winter as parthenogenetic adults, which would result in a reproductive advantage during early spring.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2012-01
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 608369
DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2012/0202
Other: 2907/S 39252
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Fundamental and Applied Limnology
  Alternative Title : Fundam. Appl. Limnol.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 179 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 281 - 291 Identifier: ISSN: 1863-9135 (print)