English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The influence of working memory on the mental representation of polymorphemic words in Dutch

Reifegerste, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2012). The influence of working memory on the mental representation of polymorphemic words in Dutch. Talk presented at the Conference on Morphological Complexity. London. 2012-01-13 - 2012-01-15.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Reifegerste, Jana1, Author           
Meyer, Antje S.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Individual Differences in Language Processing Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792545              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: morphology, comprehension, lexical decision, working memory, dual task
 Abstract: Models of the mental representation of morphologically complex words traditionally fall into one of two categories, Single-Route or Dual-Route models. The former further distinguish between Full-Listing (e.g. Butterworth, 1983) and Decomposition (e.g. Taft & Forster, 1976), while the latter assume different systems governing the access of mono- vs. polymorphemic words (e.g. Pinker & Prince, 1994; Pinker & Ullman, 2002). One of the main arguments against decomposition and continuous online computations is the cognitive resources this process would require. Turning this reasoning around, taxing someone's working memory capacities should then uniquely affect the computation of bimorphemic verb forms. We tested this hypothesis on 48 Dutch native speakers with a lexical decision task, comparing reaction times for Dutch regular past tense forms to frequency-matched irregular past tense forms, both under low and under high cognitive load. We found that frequency influenced reactions to monomorphemic but not to bimorphemic forms (F(1, 47) = 4.734, p = .035), favoring a listing account for the former but a computational procedure for the latter forms. This interaction, however, was present only for a certain group of people (F(1, 23) = 6.279, p = .02), namely those whose reaction times were hardly affected by the load manipulation and who thus may be thought of as having larger working memory capacities. On the other hand, participants who showed a strong load effect had no interaction between number of morphemes and frequency (F(1, 23) = .575, ns), indicating that they process monomorphemic and bimorphemic forms in a similar manner. It seems that cognitive capacities influence the storage of and access to polymorphemic verb forms. While people with greater working memory skills use these resources to compute morphologically complex inflections on-line, people with smaller cognitive capacities seem to rely on a list-like storage for bimorphemic forms as well.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2011
 Publication Status: Not specified
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: the Conference on Morphological Complexity
Place of Event: London
Start-/End Date: 2012-01-13 - 2012-01-15

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show