English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Economic Efficiency vs. Democracy: On the Potential Role of Competition Policy in Regulating Digital Markets in Times of Post-Truth Politics

Drexl, J. (2018). Economic Efficiency vs. Democracy: On the Potential Role of Competition Policy in Regulating Digital Markets in Times of Post-Truth Politics. In D. Gerard, & I. Lianos (Eds.), Competition Policy: Between Equity and Efficiency (pp. forthcoming). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Contribution to Collected Edition

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2881191 (Preprint)
Description:
Also published as: Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 16-16
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Drexl, Josef1, Author           
Affiliations:
1MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society, ou_2035291              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Competition law, media law, economic efficiency, social platforms, Facebook, market for ideas, conspiracy theories, post-truth politics, Brexit, Trump, populism
 Abstract: The efficiency approach, as advocated by the Chicago School in particular, only provides a very narrow approach to competition law analysis that relies on the preferences of consumers. This approach remains especially insufficient for the regulation of firms that provide citizens with politically relevant news and information. In times of digitisation, citizens increasingly rely on news disseminated by Internet intermediaries such as Facebook, Twitter or Google for making political decisions. Such firms design their business models and their algorithms for selecting the news according to a purely economic rationale. Yet recent research indicates that dissemination of news through social platforms in particular has a negative impact on the democratic process by favouring the dissemination of false factual statements, fake news and unverifiable conspiracy theories within closed communities and, ultimately, leads to radicalisation and a division of society along political and ideological lines. Experience based on the Brexit referendum in the UK and the recent presidential elections in the US highlights the ability of populist political movements to abuse the business rationale of Internet intermediaries and the functioning of their algorithms in order to win popular votes with their ‘post-truth politics’. This article relies on competition law principles to discuss future approaches to regulating the market for political ideas at the interface of competition law and media law in the new digital age. Based on constitutional considerations the article rests on the assumption that media markets should not only provide news that responds best to the psychological predispositions and subjective beliefs of the individual citizen, but also provide correct information and diversity of opinion as a basis for making informed democratic decisions.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2018
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Competition Policy: Between Equity and Efficiency
Source Genre: Collected Edition
 Creator(s):
Gerard, Damien1, Editor
Lianos, Ioannis1, Editor
Affiliations:
1 External Organizations, ou_persistent22            
Publ. Info: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: forthcoming Identifier: -