English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Benchmarking Spike Rate Inference in Population Calcium Imaging

Theis, L., Berens, P., Froudarakis, E., Reimer, J., Román Rosón, M., Baden, T., et al. (2016). Benchmarking Spike Rate Inference in Population Calcium Imaging. Neuron, 90(3), 471-482. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.014.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Link (Any fulltext)
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Theis, L1, 2, Author           
Berens, P1, 2, Author           
Froudarakis, E, Author
Reimer, J, Author
Román Rosón, M, Author
Baden, T, Author
Euler, T, Author
Tolias, AS2, 3, Author           
Bethge, M1, 2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Research Group Computational Vision and Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497805              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              
3Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497798              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: A fundamental challenge in calcium imaging has been to infer spike rates of neurons from the measured noisy fluorescence traces. We systematically evaluate different spike inference algorithms on a large benchmark dataset (>100,000 spikes) recorded from varying neural tissue (V1 and retina) using different calcium indicators (OGB-1 and GCaMP6). In addition, we introduce a new algorithm based on supervised learning in flexible probabilistic models and find that it performs better than other published techniques. Importantly, it outperforms other algorithms even when applied to entirely new datasets for which no simultaneously recorded data is available. Future data acquired in new experimental conditions can be used to further improve the spike prediction accuracy and generalization performance of the model. Finally, we show that comparing algorithms on artificial data is not informative about performance on real data, suggesting that benchmarking different methods with real-world datasets may greatly facilitate future algorithmic developments in neuroscience.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2016-05
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.014
BibTex Citekey: TheisBFRRBETB2016
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Neuron
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 90 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 471 - 482 Identifier: -