English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The importance of rock fragment density for the calculation of soil bulk density and soil organic carbon stocks

Mehler, K., Schöning, I., & Berli, M. (2014). The importance of rock fragment density for the calculation of soil bulk density and soil organic carbon stocks. Soil Science Society of America, 78(4), 1186-1191. doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.11.0480.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
BGC2078.pdf (Publisher version), 421KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
BGC2078.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, MJBK; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mehler, Knut1, Author           
Schöning, Ingo2, Author           
Berli, M., Author
Affiliations:
1Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. E.-D. Schulze, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497751              
2Soil and Ecosystem Processes, Dr. M. Schrumpf, Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. S. E. Trumbore, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497776              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: To determine the bulk density of the fine fraction (BDFF) and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks from core samples of a known volume, the volume of discarded rock fragments (RFs) has to be known. Measuring the RF density (ρRF) is labor intensive and time consuming, so the volume of RFs is often estimated based on measured RF mass and constant values for ρRF. In this study, we determined the ρRF of 87 soils in Germany and showed how different ρRF of limestone affected the calculation of BDFF and SOC stocks. For limestone, the measured ρRF in our soils was lower (2.49 ± 0.14 g cm-3) than a constant value of 2.70 g cm-3. The average difference in BDFF and SOC was 2.30 and 2.35%, respectively, which was lower than errors that arose from sampling or analytical techniques. However, differences in the BDFF and SOC stocks can be as high as 37% when ρRF is below 2.20 g cm-3 and there is an increase in the subsoil RF content of up to 70%. Therefore, accurately determining the ρRF, at least in the subsoil, is recommended when RFs dominate the total volume of the sample to reduce potential measurement errors. The necessity of using the actual ρRF instead of using a constant value depends on the variation in ρRF, the RF content, and the intended accuracy of the BDFF and SOC stock estimation.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 20142014-07-182014
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: Other: BGC2078
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2013.11.0480
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Soil Science Society of America
  Other : SSSAJ
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Soil Science Society of America
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 78 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1186 - 1191 Identifier: ISSN: 1435-0661
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1435-0661