Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Why you think Milan is larger than Modena: Neural correlates of the recognition heuristic

Volz, K. G., Schooler, L. J., Schubotz, R. I., Raab, M., Gigerenzer, G., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Why you think Milan is larger than Modena: Neural correlates of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1924-1936. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1924.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
volz_why.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 351KB
Name:
volz_why.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Volz, Kirsten G.1, Autor           
Schooler, L. J., Autor
Schubotz, Ricarda Ines1, Autor           
Raab, Markus, Autor
Gigerenzer, Gerd2, Autor           
von Cramon, D. Yves1, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department Cognitive Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634563              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: When ranking two alternatives by some criteria and only one of the alternatives is recognized, participants overwhelmingly adopt the strategy, termed the recognition heuristic (RH), of choosing the recognized alternative. Understanding the neural correlates underlying decisions that follow the RH could help determine whether people make judgments about the RH's applicability or simply choose the recognized alternative. We measured brain activity by using functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants indicated which of two cities they thought was larger (Experiment 1) or which city they recognized (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, increased activation was observed within the anterior frontomedian cortex (aFMC), precuneus, and retrosplenial cortex when participants followed the RH compared to when they did not. Experiment 2 revealed that RH decisional processes cannot be reduced to recognition memory processes. As the aFMC has previously been associated with self-referential judgments, we conclude that RH decisional processes involve an assessment about the applicability of the RH.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2006
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: eDoc: 293238
Anderer: P7277
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1924
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Cambridge, MA : MIT Press Journals
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 18 (11) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 1924 - 1936 Identifikator: ISSN: 0898-929X
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/991042752752726