日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Trimodal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events

Bresciani, J.-P., Dammeier, F., & Ernst, M. (2008). Trimodal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events. Brain Research Bulletin, 75(6), 753-760. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.009.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Bresciani, J-P1, 著者           
Dammeier, F1, 2, 著者           
Ernst, MO2, 著者           
所属:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Research Group Multisensory Perception and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497806              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: We investigated the interactions between visual, tactile and auditory sensory signals for the perception of sequences of events. Sequences of flashes, taps and beeps were presented simultaneously. For each session, subjects were instructed to count the number of events presented in one modality (Target) and to ignore the stimuli presented in the other modalities (Background). The number of events presented in the background sequence could differ from the number of events in the target sequence. For each session, we quantified the Background-evoked bias by comparing subjects’ responses with and without Background (Target presented alone). Nine combinations between vision, touch and audition were tested. In each session but two, the Background significantly biased the Target. Vision was the most susceptible to Background-evoked bias and the least efficient in biasing the other two modalities. By contrast, audition was the least susceptible to Background-evoked bias and the most efficient in biasing the other two modalities. These differences were strongly correlated to the relative reliability of each modality. In line with this, the evoked biases were larger when the Background consisted of two instead of only one modality. These results show that for the perception of sequences of events: (1) vision, touch and audition are automatically integrated; (2) the respective contributions of the three modalities to the integrated percept differ; (3) the relative contribution of each modality depends on its relative reliability (1/variability); (4) task-irrelevant stimuli have more weight when presented in two rather than only one modality.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2008-02
 出版の状態: 出版
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.009
BibTex参照ID: 4631
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Brain Research Bulletin
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: -
ページ: - 巻号: 75 (6) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 753 - 760 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): -