English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Physical instrumental vetoes for gravitational-wave burst triggers

Ajith, P., Hewitson, M., Smith, J. R., Grote, H., Hild, S., & Strain, K. A. (2007). Physical instrumental vetoes for gravitational-wave burst triggers. Physical Review D, 76: 042004. Retrieved from http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v76/e042004.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
316890.pdf (Publisher version), 3MB
Name:
316890.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: PUBLIC
License:
-
:
0705.1111v1.pdf (Preprint), 3MB
Name:
0705.1111v1.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: PUBLIC
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ajith, P.1, 2, 3, Author
Hewitson, Martin3, Author           
Smith, J. R.1, 2, 3, Author
Grote, Hartmut2, Author           
Hild, Stefan2, Author           
Strain, Kenneth A.2, Author           
Affiliations:
1AEI-Hannover, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_24009              
2Laser Interferometry & Gravitational Wave Astronomy, AEI-Hannover, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_24010              
3Observational Relativity and Cosmology, AEI-Hannover, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_24011              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We present a robust strategy to \emph{veto} certain classes of instrumental glitches that appear at the output of interferometric gravitational-wave (GW) detectors.This veto method is `physical' in the sense that, in order to veto a burst trigger, we make use of our knowledge of the coupling of different detector subsystems to the main detector output. The main idea behind this method is that the noise in an instrumental channel X can be \emph{transferred} to the detector output (channel H) using the \emph{transfer function} from X to H, provided the noise coupling is \emph{linear} and the transfer function is \emph{unique}. If a non-stationarity in channel H is causally related to one in channel X, the two have to be consistent with the transfer function. We formulate two methods for testing the consistency between the burst triggers in channel X and channel H. One method makes use of the \emph{null-stream} constructed from channel H and the \emph{transferred} channel X, and the second involves cross-correlating the two. We demonstrate the efficiency of the veto by `injecting' instrumental glitches in the hardware of the GEO 600 detector. The \emph{veto safety} is demonstrated by performing GW-like hardware injections. We also show an example application of this method using 5 days of data from the fifth science run of GEO 600. The method is found to have very high veto efficiency with a very low accidental veto rate.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2007
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 316890
Other: arXiv:0705.1111v1 [gr-qc]
URI: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v76/e042004
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Physical Review D
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 76 Sequence Number: 042004 Start / End Page: - Identifier: -