English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Are there core and peripheral syntactic structures? Experimental evidence from Dutch native speakers with varying literacy levels

Favier, S., & Huettig, F. (2021). Are there core and peripheral syntactic structures? Experimental evidence from Dutch native speakers with varying literacy levels. Lingua, 251: 102991. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102991.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Favier_Huettig_2021_Are there core and pheripheral syntactic structures.pdf (Publisher version), 411KB
Name:
Favier_Huettig_2021_Are there core and pheripheral syntactic structures.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Favier, Saoradh1, 2, Author              
Huettig, Falk1, 3, Author              
Affiliations:
1Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792545              
2International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_1119545              
3Center for Language Studies, External Organizations, ou_55238              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: core grammar, peripheral structures, grammaticality judgments
 Abstract: Some theorists posit the existence of a ‘core’ grammar that virtually all native speakers acquire, and a ‘peripheral’ grammar that many do not. We investigated the viability of such a categorical distinction in the Dutch language. We first consulted linguists’ intuitions as to the ‘core’ or ‘peripheral’ status of a wide range of grammatical structures. We then tested a selection of core- and peripheral-rated structures on naïve participants with varying levels of literacy experience, using grammaticality judgment as a proxy for receptive knowledge. Overall, participants demonstrated better knowledge of ‘core’ structures than ‘peripheral’ structures, but the considerable variability within these categories was strongly suggestive of a continuum rather than a categorical distinction between them. We also hypothesised that individual differences in the knowledge of core and peripheral structures would reflect participants’ literacy experience. This was supported only by a small trend in our data. The results fit best with the notion that more frequent syntactic structures are mastered by more people than infrequent ones and challenge the received sense of a categorical core-periphery distinction.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2020-10-142021-01-152021-02
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102991
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Lingua
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 251 Sequence Number: 102991 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0024-3841
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925421093