English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Processing VP-ellipsis and VP-anaphora with structurally parallel and nonparallel antecedents: An eyetracking study

Roberts, L., Matsuo, A., & Duffield, N. (2013). Processing VP-ellipsis and VP-anaphora with structurally parallel and nonparallel antecedents: An eyetracking study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 29-47. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.676190.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-2A0A-9 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0026-B846-F
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Roberts_Language_Cognitive_Processes_2013.pdf (Publisher version), 181KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Roberts_Language_Cognitive_Processes_2013.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Roberts, Leah1, Author              
Matsuo, Ayumi2, Author
Duffield, Nigel2, Author
Affiliations:
1Language Acquisition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_792546              
2Centre for Linguistic Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In this paper, we report on an eye-tracking study investigating the processing of English VP-ellipsis (John took the rubbish out. Fred did [] too) (VPE) and VP-anaphora (John took the rubbish out. Fred did it too) (VPA) constructions, with syntactically parallel versus nonparallel antecedent clauses (e.g., The rubbish was taken out by John. Fred did [] too/Fred did it too). The results show first that VPE involves greater processing costs than VPA overall. Second, although the structural nonparallelism of the antecedent clause elicited a processing cost for both anaphor types, there was a difference in the timing and the strength of this parallelism effect: it was earlier and more fleeting for VPA, as evidenced by regression path times, whereas the effect occurred later with VPE completions, showing up in second and total fixation times measures, and continuing on into the reading of the adjacent text. Taking the observed differences between the processing of the two anaphor types together with other research findings in the literature, we argue that our data support the idea that in the case of VPE, the VP from the antecedent clause necessitates more computation at the elision site before it is linked to its antecedent than is the case for VPA.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 200920122013
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.676190
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language and Cognitive Processes
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: London, UK : Taylor & Francis
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 28 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 29 - 47 Identifier: Other: 954925267270
ISSN: 0169-0965
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925267270