Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages

Enfield, N. J., Dingemanse, M., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Brown, P., Dirksmeyer, T., et al. (2013). Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 343-380). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Enfield et al. - 2013 - Huh What A first survey in 21 languages (Verlagsversion), 722KB
Name:
Enfield et al. - 2013 - Huh What A first survey in 21 languages
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Enfield, N. J.1, 2, 3, Autor           
Dingemanse, Mark2, 3, 4, Autor           
Baranova, Julija1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Autor           
Blythe, Joe2, 3, 4, Autor           
Brown, Penelope2, 3, 4, Autor           
Dirksmeyer, Tyko2, 4, 5, Autor           
Drew, Paul, Autor
Floyd, Simeon1, 2, Autor           
Gipper, Sonja2, 4, Autor           
Gisladottir, Rosa S.2, 4, 5, Autor           
Hoymann, Gertie2, 4, Autor           
Kendrick, Kobin H.2, 4, Autor           
Levinson, Stephen C.1, 2, 4, 6, 7, Autor           
Magyari, Lilla2, 4, Autor           
Manrique, Elizabeth1, 2, 5, Autor           
Rossi, Giovanni2, 4, Autor           
San Roque, Lila2, 4, Autor           
Torreira, Francisco2, 4, 7, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Human Sociality and Systems of Language Use, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_808546              
2Interactional Foundations of Language, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_745546              
3Language documentation and data mining, ou_persistent22              
4Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792548              
5International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_1119545              
6Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, ou_55236              
7INTERACT, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, NL, ou_1863331              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Introduction A comparison of conversation in twenty-one languages from around the world reveals commonalities and differences in the way that people do open-class other-initiation of repair (Schegloff, Jefferson, and Sacks, 1977; Drew, 1997). We find that speakers of all of the spoken languages in the sample make use of a primary interjection strategy (in English it is Huh?), where the phonetic form of the interjection is strikingly similar across the languages: a monosyllable featuring an open non-back vowel [a, æ, ə, ʌ], often nasalized, usually with rising intonation and sometimes an [h-] onset. We also find that most of the languages have another strategy for open-class other-initiation of repair, namely the use of a question word (usually “what”). Here we find significantly more variation across the languages. The phonetic form of the question word involved is completely different from language to language: e.g., English [wɑt] versus Cha'palaa [ti] versus Duna [aki]. Furthermore, the grammatical structure in which the repair-initiating question word can or must be expressed varies within and across languages. In this chapter we present data on these two strategies – primary interjections like Huh? and question words like What? – with discussion of possible reasons for the similarities and differences across the languages. We explore some implications for the notion of repair as a system, in the context of research on the typology of language use. The general outline of this chapter is as follows. We first discuss repair as a system across languages and then introduce the focus of the chapter: open-class other-initiation of repair. A discussion of the main findings follows, where we identify two alternative strategies in the data: an interjection strategy (Huh?) and a question word strategy (What?). Formal features and possible motivations are discussed for the interjection strategy and the question word strategy in order. A final section discusses bodily behavior including posture, eyebrow movements and eye gaze, both in spoken languages and in a sign language.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 20112013
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511757464.012
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Conversational repair and human understanding
Genre der Quelle: Buch
 Urheber:
Hayashi, Makoto, Herausgeber
Raymond, Geoffrey, Herausgeber
Sidnell, Jack, Herausgeber
Affiliations:
-
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: New York : Cambridge University Press
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 343 - 380 Identifikator: ISBN: 9781107002791
URI: http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item6932933/?site_locale=en_GB

Quelle 2

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics
Genre der Quelle: Reihe
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 30 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -