English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a "Social Market Economy"

Scharpf, F. W. (2010). The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a "Social Market Economy". Socio-Economic Review, 8(2), 211-250. doi:10.1093/ser/mwp031.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
SER_8_2010_Scharpf.pdf (Any fulltext), 351KB
Name:
SER_8_2010_Scharpf.pdf
Description:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp031 (Publisher version)
Description:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Scharpf, Fritz W.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Globale Strukturen und ihre Steuerung, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214547              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Europe • socio-economic regimes • law • democratic capitalism
 Abstract: Judge-made law has played a crucial role in the process of European integration. In the vertical dimension, it has greatly reduced the range of autonomous policy choices in the member states, and it has helped to expand the reach of European competences. At the same time, however, ‘integration through law’ does have a liberalizing and deregulatory impact on the socio-economic regimes of European Union member states. This effect is generally compatible with the status quo in liberal market economies, but it tends to undermine the institutions and policy legacies of Continental and Scandinavian social market economies. Given the high consensus requirements of European legislation, this structural asymmetry cannot be corrected through political action at the European level.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2009-12-242010
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: 1. Integration through politics and integration through law
2. Judicial deregulation and legislative liberalization
3. The vertical and horizontal impact of integration by law
4. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 475557
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwp031
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Socio-Economic Review
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 8 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 211 - 250 Identifier: ISSN: 1475-1461
ISSN: 1475-147X