English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  One Political Economy, One Competitive Strategy? Comparing Pharmaceutical Firms in Germany, Italy, and the UK

Herrmann, A. M. (2008). One Political Economy, One Competitive Strategy? Comparing Pharmaceutical Firms in Germany, Italy, and the UK. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford University Press.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Description:
Full text via Oxford Scholarship Online
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Herrmann, Andrea M.1, 2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Projekte von Gastwissenschaftlern und Postdoc-Stipendiaten, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214554              
2Utrecht University, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: varieties of capitalism, corporate competitiveness, innovation strategies, institutions, comparative advantages, industrial relations, corporate governance, antitrust legislation, pharmaceutical industry
 Abstract: This book examines how firms adapt to the pressures of increasing international competition by testing both the arguments on ‘strategy specialization’ proposed in the competitiveness literature in general, and those offered by contributors to the ‘varieties of capitalism’ debate in particular. If different economies are characterized by distinct institutional arrangements — successful firms would be the ones that exploit their comparative advantages and specialize in the competitive strategies facilitated by national institutions. The book begins with an assessment of how many pharmaceutical firms in Germany, Italy, and the UK pursue strategies facilitated by national institutions governing financial markets, antitrust activities, and the labour market. Quantitative analyses reveal that deviant firms, competing through institutionally unsupported strategies, outnumber conforming firms by far. Not only does this finding run counter to the expectations of the competitiveness literature, it brings up a whole new line of inquiry. How can firms compete through strategies that are not supported by national institutions? To address this question, the book combines quantitative analyses with qualitative insights, showing that firms do not necessarily exploit comparative institutional advantages, but that they can successfully circumvent institutional constraints. International markets and individual collaboration on a contractual basis allow firms to compete despite comparative institutional disadvantages. These findings suggest that trade liberalization tends to foster strategy diversification rather than strategy specialization, depending on the inventiveness of entrepreneurs in developing individual approaches toward competing.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2008
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: XVI, 202
 Publishing info: Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford University Press
 Table of Contents: PART I Specialization in Line with Comparative Institutional Advantages?
1 Introduction
2 Patterns of Strategy Specialization
PART II Linking Institutions, Input Factors, and Competitive Strategies
3 Linking Financial Market Institutions, Corporate Finance, and Competitive Strategies
4 Linking Antitrust Legislation, Standards, and Competitive Strategies
5 Linking Labour‐Market Institutions, Employee Skills, and Competitive Strategies
PART III Strategy Choice, Success, and Sustainability in Perspective
6 Excursus: Success and Choice of Competitive Strategies
7 Conclusion
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 405702
ISBN: 978-0-19-954343-4
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543434.001.0001
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show