English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism

Crouch, C., & Farrell, H. (2004). Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism. Rationality and Society, 16(1), 5-43. doi:10.1177/1043463104039874.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
RS_16_2004_Crouch.pdf (Publisher version), 714KB
Name:
RS_16_2004_Crouch.pdf
Description:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
Abstract
OA-Status:
Locator:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043463104039874 (Publisher version)
Description:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Crouch, Colin1, 2, Author           
Farrell, Henry, Author
Affiliations:
1Auswärtiges Wissenschaftliches Mitglied, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214545              
2University of Warwick Business School, UK, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Bayesian ; innovation ; neo-institutionalism ; path dependence ; redundancy
 Abstract: The concept of path dependence is being used in highly deterministic ways in neo-institutionalist analysis, so that studies using this framework have dif.culty in accounting for, or predicting, change. However, the original Polya urn model from which pathdependence theory draws predicts that alternative paths will be possible. It can then be argued that actors will be able to use these when they perceive a need to change. This article seeks to capture this possibility through accommodating a Bayesian parametric decision-maker interacting with an environment. This makes it possible to examine how change may involve such processes as: the use of past or redundant institutional repertoires; transfer of experience across action spaces; or from other agents, through networks of structured relationships; the emergence of perceived ‘one best’ solutions. This approach points to the need to change how typologies are used in neo-institutionalist research, so that those features of cases that do not .t the pre-conceived framework of a type are not disregarded as ‘noise’, but properly evaluated as potential resources for change.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2004
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 230521
DOI: 10.1177/1043463104039874
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Rationality and Society
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 16 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 5 - 43 Identifier: ISSN: 1043-4631
ISSN: 1461-7358