English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  An orthographic effect in phoneme processing, and its limitations

Cutler, A., & Davis, C. (2012). An orthographic effect in phoneme processing, and its limitations. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 18. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00018.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Cutler_Davis_An_orthographic_effect_2012_Front_Psychology.pdf (Publisher version), 735KB
Name:
Cutler_Davis_An_orthographic_effect_2012_Front_Psychology.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2012
Copyright Info:
© 2012 Cutler and Davis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Cutler, Anne1, 2, 3, Author           
Davis, Chris4, Author
Affiliations:
1Language Comprehension Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_792550              
2Mechanisms and Representations in Comprehending Speech, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_55215              
3Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              
4MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: To examine whether lexically stored knowledge about spelling influences phoneme evaluation, we conducted three experiments with a low-level phonetic judgement task: phoneme goodness rating. In each experiment, listeners heard phonetic tokens varying along a continuum centred on /s/, occurring finally in isolated word or nonword tokens. An effect of spelling appeared in Experiment 1: Native English speakers’ goodness ratings for the best /s/ tokens were significantly higher in words spelled with S (e.g., bless) than in words spelled with C (e.g., voice). No such difference appeared when nonnative speakers rated the same materials in Experiment 2, indicating that the difference could not be due to acoustic characteristics of the S- versus C-words. In Experiment 3, nonwords with lexical neighbours consistently spelled with S (e.g., pless) versus with C (e.g., floice) failed to elicit orthographic neighbourhood effects; no significant difference appeared in native English speakers’ ratings for the S-consistent versus the C-consistent sets. Obligatory influence of lexical knowledge on phonemic processing would have predicted such neighbourhood effects; the findings are thus better accommodated by models in which phonemic decisions draw strategically upon lexical information.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20112012-01-142012
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00018
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Frontiers in Psychology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Frontiers media
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 3 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 18 Identifier: -