Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Recognition of signed and spoken language: Different sensory inputs, the same segmentation procedure

Orfanidou, E., Adam, R., Morgan, G., & McQueen, J. M. (2010). Recognition of signed and spoken language: Different sensory inputs, the same segmentation procedure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 272-283. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.001.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Orfanidou_JML_2010.pdf (Verlagsversion), 717KB
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
Orfanidou_JML_2010.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Orfanidou, Eleni1, Autor
Adam, Robert1, Autor
Morgan, Gary1, Autor
McQueen, James M.2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department of Language Communication Science, City University, London, UK, ou_persistent22              
2Language Comprehension Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_55203              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Signed languages are articulated through simultaneous upper-body movements and are seen; spoken languages are articulated through sequential vocal-tract movements and are heard. But word recognition in both language modalities entails segmentation of a continuous input into discrete lexical units. According to the Possible Word Constraint (PWC), listeners segment speech so as to avoid impossible words in the input. We argue here that the PWC is a modality-general principle. Deaf signers of British Sign Language (BSL) spotted real BSL signs embedded in nonsense-sign contexts more easily when the nonsense signs were possible BSL signs than when they were not. A control experiment showed that there were no articulatory differences between the different contexts. A second control experiment on segmentation in spoken Dutch strengthened the claim that the main BSL result likely reflects the operation of a lexical-viability constraint. It appears that signed and spoken languages, in spite of radical input differences, are segmented so as to leave no residues of the input that cannot be words.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2009-12-012009-12-302010
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.001
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Journal of Memory and Language
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 62 (3) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 272 - 283 Identifikator: Anderer: 954928495417
ISSN: 0749-596X