English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments

Becks, L., & Agrawal, A. F. (2012). The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments. PLoS Biology, 10(5): e1001317. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001317.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-D30A-0 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-D30B-E
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Becks_2012b.pdf (Publisher version), 640KB
Name:
Becks_2012b.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Becks, Lutz1, Author              
Agrawal, Aneil F., Author
Affiliations:
1Research Group Community Dynamics, Department Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society, ou_1445642              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Both theory and experiments have demonstrated that sex can facilitate adaptation, potentially yielding a group-level advantage to sex. However, it is unclear whether this process can help solve the more difficult problem of the maintenance of sex within populations. Using experimental populations of the facultatively sexual rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus, we show that rates of sex evolve to higher levels during adaptation but then decline as fitness plateaus. To assess the fitness consequences of genetic mixing, we directly compare the fitnesses of sexually and asexually derived genotypes that naturally occur in our experimental populations. Sexually derived genotypes are more fit than asexually derived genotypes when adaptive pressures are strong, but this pattern reverses as the pace of adaptation slows, matching the pattern of evolutionary change in the rate of sex. These fitness assays test the net effect of sex but cannot be used to disentangle whether selection on sex arises because highly sexual lineages become associated with different allele combinations or with different allele frequencies than less sexual lineages (i.e., ‘‘short-’’ or ‘‘long-term’’ effects, respectively). We infer which of these mechanisms provides an advantage to sex by performing additional manipulations to obtain fitness distributions of sexual and asexual progeny arrays from unbiased parents (rather than from naturally occurring, and thereby evolutionarily biased, parents). We find evidence that sex breaks down adaptive gene combinations, resulting in lower average fitness of sexual progeny (i.e., a short-term disadvantage to sex). As predicted by theory, the advantage to sex arises because sexually derived progeny are more variable in fitness, allowing for faster adaptation. This ‘‘long-term advantage’’ builds over multiple generations, eventually resulting in higher fitness of sexual types.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2012-05-01
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 610663
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001317
Other: 2931/S 39276
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: PLoS Biology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 10 (5) Sequence Number: e1001317 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1544-9173 (print)
ISSN: 1545-7885 (online)