English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The phantom midge and a comparison of metapopulation structures

Berendonk, T. U., & Bonsall, M. B. (2002). The phantom midge and a comparison of metapopulation structures. Ecology, 83(1), 116-128.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
berendonk_2002.pdf (Publisher version), 190KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
berendonk_2002.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, MPLM; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Berendonk, Thomas U.1, Author           
Bonsall, Michael B., Author
Affiliations:
1Department Ecophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society, ou_976547              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Chaoborus; colonizations; dispersal; extinctions; lakes and ponds; metapopulations; phantom midge
 Abstract: Two sister species of Chaoborus exist in Europe. They are found in two distinct habitats that differ strongly in habitat persistence time. Chaoborus flavicans is found primarily in lakes inhabited by fish, whereas Chaoborus crystallinus is found exclusively in small ponds without fish. Chaoborus flavicans has evolved an adaptive response to predatory fish. In the presence of fish chemicals it can migrate vertically in the water column and can thus avoid predation. Chaoborus flavicans can therefore coexist with fish. Chaoborus crystallinus avoids oviposition into water bodies that are inhabited by fish and hence lives only in small fish-free ponds. These differences lead to several testable hypotheses: (1) The extinction risk of local populations of C. crystallinus is higher than that for C. flavicans. (2) C. crystallinus has a higher dispersal probability than C. flavicans. (3) The spatial population structure of each species differ. The results from a 3-yr population survey verified the first hypothesis that the extinction risk for C. crystallinus is higher than for C. flavicans, Field and laboratory experiments confirmed the second hypothesis. The results showed that. although C. flavicans disperses faster. the probability that C. crystallinus individuals disperse farther than 1 km is almost an order of magnitude higher compared to C. flavicans. The comparison of the spatial population structure of the two species shows that Chaoborus live in two different population structures that are subject to different metapopulation processes. Chaoborus crystallinus exists in a Levins- metapopulation, while C. flavicans exhibits a mainland-island population structure, these findings confirmed the third hypothesis. These results show that two species of the same genus live in two very different metapopulation structures and therefore present an ideal system to test comparative hypotheses within metapopulation ecology.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2002-01
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 3981
ISI: 000173117700011
Other: 2119/S 37831
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Ecology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 83 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 116 - 128 Identifier: ISSN: 0012-9658