English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

Gross, J., Baillet, S., Barnes, G. R., Henson, R. N., Hillebrand, A., Jensen, O., et al. (2013). Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. NeuroImage, 65, 349-363. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Gross_NeuroImage_2013.pdf (Publisher version), 342KB
Name:
Gross_NeuroImage_2013.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2012
Copyright Info:
© 2012 Elsevier Inc

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Gross, Joachim1, Author
Baillet, Sylvain2, Author
Barnes, Gareth R3, Author
Henson, Richard N4, Author
Hillebrand, Arjan5, Author
Jensen, Ole6, Author           
Jerbi, Karim7, Author
Litvak, Vladimir3, Author
Maess, Burkhard8, Author
Oostenveld, Robert6, Author           
Parkkonen, Lauri9, 10, Author
Taylor, Jason R4, Author
Van Wassenhove, Virginie11, 12, 13, Author
Wibral, Michael14, Author
Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs6, 15, Author           
Affiliations:
1Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, ou_persistent22              
2McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, ou_persistent22              
3Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK, ou_persistent22              
4MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK, ou_persistent22              
5Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and Magnetoencephalography Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
6Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              
7Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon University, Lyon, France, ou_persistent22              
8MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, ou_persistent22              
9Brain Research Unit, O.V. Lounasmaa laboratory, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finlan, ou_persistent22              
10Dept. of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland, ou_persistent22              
11INSERM, U992, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, F-91191 Gif/Yvette, France, ou_persistent22              
12CEA, DSV/I2BM, NeuroSpin Center, F-91191 Gif/Yvette, France, ou_persistent22              
13Univ Paris-Sud, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, F-91191 Gif/Yvette, France, ou_persistent22              
14rain Imaging Centre, Frankfurt, Germany, ou_persistent22              
15Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings are a rich source of information about the neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes in the brain, with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In recent years there have been considerable advances in MEG hardware developments as well as methodological developments. Sophisticated analysis techniques are now routinely applied and continuously improved, leading to fascinating insights into the intricate dynamics of neural processes. However, the rapidly increasing level of complexity of the different steps in a MEG study make it difficult for novices, and sometimes even for experts, to stay aware of possible limitations and caveats. Furthermore, the complexity of MEG data acquisition and data analysis requires special attention when describing MEG studies in publications, in order to facilitate interpretation and reproduction of the results. This manuscript aims at making recommendations for a number of important data acquisition and data analysis steps and suggests details that should be specified in manuscripts reporting MEG studies. These recommendations will hopefully serve as guidelines that help to strengthen the position of the MEG research community within the field of neuroscience, and may foster discussion within the community in order to further enhance the quality and impact of MEG research.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 201220122013
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: NeuroImage
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Orlando, FL : Academic Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 65 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 349 - 363 Identifier: ISSN: 1053-8119
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954922650166