English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods

Hofmann, M., Bezrukov, I., Mantlik, F., Aschoff, P., Steinke, F., Beyer, T., et al. (2011). MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 52(9), 1392-1399. doi:10.2967/jnumed.110.078949.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Hofmann, M.1, Author           
Bezrukov, I.1, Author           
Mantlik, F.1, Author           
Aschoff, P.., Author
Steinke, F.2, Author
Beyer, T., Author
Pichler, B. J., Author
Schölkopf, B.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Dept. Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Max Planck Society, ou_1497647              
2Max Planck Society, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: MPI für Intelligente Systeme; Abt. Schölkopf;
 Abstract: PET/MRI is an emerging dual-modality imaging technology that requires new approaches to PET attenuation correction (AC). We assessed 2 algorithms for whole-body MRI-based AC (MRAC): a basic MR image segmentation algorithm and a method based on atlas registration and pattern recognition (AT&PR). METHODS: Eleven patients each underwent a whole-body PET/CT study and a separate multibed whole-body MRI study. The MR image segmentation algorithm uses a combination of image thresholds, Dixon fat-water segmentation, and component analysis to detect the lungs. MR images are segmented into 5 tissue classes (not including bone), and each class is assigned a default linear attenuation value. The AT&PR algorithm uses a database of previously aligned pairs of MRI/CT image volumes. For each patient, these pairs are registered to the patient MRI volume, and machine-learning techniques are used to predict attenuation values on a continuous scale. MRAC methods are compared via the quantitative analysis of AC PET images using volumes of interest in normal organs and on lesions. We assume the PET/CT values after CT-based AC to be the reference standard. RESULTS: In regions of normal physiologic uptake, the average error of the mean standardized uptake value was 14.1% ± 10.2% and 7.7% ± 8.4% for the segmentation and the AT&PR methods, respectively. Lesion-based errors were 7.5% ± 7.9% for the segmentation method and 5.7% ± 4.7% for the AT&PR method. CONCLUSION: The MRAC method using AT&PR provided better overall PET quantification accuracy than the basic MR image segmentation approach. This better quantification was due to the significantly reduced volume of errors made regarding volumes of interest within or near bones and the slightly reduced volume of errors made regarding areas outside the lungs.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2011-09-01
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 596165
URI: http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/
Other: HofmannBMASBPS2011
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078949
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: 7 Volume / Issue: 52 (9) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1392 - 1399 Identifier: -