Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
 Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht
  Comparing Apples and Oranges? Public, Private, Tax, and Criminal Law in Financial Markets Regulation

Hellgardt, A. (2014). Comparing Apples and Oranges? Public, Private, Tax, and Criminal Law in Financial Markets Regulation. In W.-G. Ringe, & P. M. Huber (Eds.), Legal Challenges in the Global Financial Crisis: Bail-outs, the Euro and Regulation (pp. 157-176). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Item is

 

einblenden: alle ausblenden: alle

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Datensatz-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000E-751B-3 Versions-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0026-A7A3-6
Genre: Beitrag in Sammelwerk

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2083462 (Preprint)
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Hellgardt, Alexander1, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Business and Tax Law, MPI for Tax Law and Public Finance, Max Planck Society, ou_830551              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Financial markets regulation, regulatory choice, sanctions, corrective taxation
 Zusammenfassung: This paper discusses different means of regulation, taking the example of post-crisis financial markets regulation. It is remarkable that the general discussion about reforming financial regulation centres on the substantive standards of the new rules and neglects the problem of choosing the right regulatory instruments. The paper focuses on four basic instruments of law enforcement (administrative sanctions; civil liability; corrective taxation; criminal sanctions) and takes three examples of regulatory choice in financial markets regulation. Using a number of different yardsticks for comparison, it analyses the relative strengths and weaknesses of the four instruments and employs a cost-benefit analysis. It turns out that civil liability – while limited in its scope – exhibits the best cost-benefit ratio. Criminal law, by contrast, seems very inefficient. Administrative law and corrective taxation come in second best. The return from using these instruments has to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2014
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: -
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Legal Challenges in the Global Financial Crisis: Bail-outs, the Euro and Regulation
Genre der Quelle: Sammelwerk
 Urheber:
Ringe, Wolf-Georg1, Herausgeber
Huber, Peter M. 1, Herausgeber
Affiliations:
1 External Organizations, ou_persistent22            
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Oxford : Hart Publishing
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 157 - 176 Identifikator: ISBN: 978-1-84946-439-0

Quelle 2

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law
Genre der Quelle: Reihe
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 18 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -