English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Action–sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG

Horváth, J., Maess, B., Baess, P., & Tóth, A. (2012). Action–sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(9), 1919-1931. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00215.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000E-B684-B Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-FA74-1
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Horvath_2012_Action.pdf (Publisher version), 343KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Horvath_2012_Action.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Horváth, János1, Author
Maess, Burkhard2, Author              
Baess, Pamela3, Author
Tóth, Annamária4, Author
Affiliations:
1Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary, ou_persistent22              
2Methods and Development Unit MEG and EEG: Signal Analysis and Modelling, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634559              
3School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, ou_persistent22              
4Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The N1 auditory ERP and its magnetic counterpart (N1[m]) are suppressed when elicited by self-induced sounds. Because the N1(m) is a correlate of auditory event detection, this N1 suppression effect is generally interpreted as a reflection of the workings of an internal forward model: The forward model captures the contingency (causal relationship) between the action and the sound, and this is used to cancel the predictable sensory reafference when the action is initiated. In this study, we demonstrated in three experiments using a novel coincidence paradigm that actual contingency between actions and sounds is not a necessary condition for N1 suppression. Participants performed time interval production tasks: They pressed a key to set the boundaries of time intervals. Concurrently, but independently of keypresses, a sequence of pure tones with random onset-to-onset intervals was presented. Tones coinciding with keypresses elicited suppressed N1(m) and P2(m), suggesting that action–stimulus contiguity (temporal proximity) is sufficient to suppress sensory processing related to the detection of auditory events.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2012-02-232012-09
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00215
PMID: 22360594
Other: Epub 2012
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Cambridge, MA : MIT Press Journals
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 24 (9) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1919 - 1931 Identifier: ISSN: 0898-929X
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/991042752752726