English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Quality control of CarboEurope flux data - Part 2: inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software

Mauder, M., Foken, T., Clement, R., Elbers, J. A., Eugster, W., Grunwald, T., et al. (2008). Quality control of CarboEurope flux data - Part 2: inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software. Biogeosciences, 5(2), 451-462. doi:10.5194/bg-5-451-2008.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
BGC1116.pdf (Publisher version), 509KB
Name:
BGC1116.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/octet-stream / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-
:
BGC1116D.pdf (Preprint), 735KB
Name:
BGC1116D.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/octet-stream / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-451-2008 (Publisher version)
Description:
OA
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mauder, M., Author
Foken, T., Author
Clement, R., Author
Elbers, J. A., Author
Eugster, W., Author
Grunwald, T., Author
Heusinkveld, B., Author
Kolle, O.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Service Facility Field Measurements & Instrumentation, O. Kolle, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497769              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Energy-balance closure Frequency-response corrections Anemometer (co)sine response Net ecosystem exchange Sonic anemometer CO2 fluxes Open-path Scalar similarity Tall vegetation Water-vapor
 Abstract: As part of the quality assurance and quality control activities within the CarboEurope-IP network, a comparison of eddy-covariance software was conducted. For four five-day datasets, CO2 flux estimates were calculated by seven commonly used software packages to assess the uncertainty of CO2 flux estimates due to differences in post-processing. The datasets originated from different sites representing different commonly applied instrumentation and different canopy structures to cover a wide range of realistic conditions. Data preparation, coordinate rotation and the implementation of the correction for high frequency spectral losses were identified as crucial processing steps leading to significant discrepancies in the CO2 flux results. The overall comparison indicated a good although not yet perfect agreement among the different software within 5-10% difference for 30-min CO2 flux values. Conceptually different ideas about the selection and application of processing steps were a main reason for the differences in the CO2 flux estimates observed. A balance should be aspired between scientific freedom on the one hand, in order to advance methodical issues, and standardisation of procedures on the other hand, in order to obtain comparable fluxes for multi-site synthesis studies. [References: 54]

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2008
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: Other: BGC1116
DOI: 10.5194/bg-5-451-2008
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Biogeosciences
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany : Copernicus GmbH on behalf of the European Geosciences Union
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 5 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 451 - 462 Identifier: CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/111087929276006
ISSN: 1726-4170