English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Blank assessment for ultra-small radiocarbon samples: chemical extraction and separation versus AMS

Santos, G. M., Southon, J. R., Drenzek, N. J., Ziolkowski, L. A., Druffel, E., Xu, X. M., et al. (2010). Blank assessment for ultra-small radiocarbon samples: chemical extraction and separation versus AMS. Radiocarbon, 52(3), 1322-1335. doi:10.1017/S0033822200046415.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
BGC1437.pdf (Publisher version), 322KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
BGC1437.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, MJBK; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/octet-stream
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Santos, G. M., Author
Southon, J. R., Author
Drenzek, N. J., Author
Ziolkowski, L. A., Author
Druffel, E., Author
Xu, X. M., Author
Zhang, D. C., Author
Trumbore, S.1, Author           
Eglinton, T. I., Author
Hughen, K. A., Author
Affiliations:
1Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. S. E. Trumbore, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497752              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: kccams/uci facility organic-carbon c-14 fractionation contamination delta-c-14 california system
 Abstract: The Keck Carbon Cycle AMS facility at the University of California, Irvine (KCCAMS/UCI) has developed protocols for analyzing radiocarbon in samples as small as similar to 0.001 mg of carbon (C). Mass-balance background corrections for modem and C-14-dead carbon contamination (MC and DC, respectively) can be assessed by measuring C-14-free and modern standards, respectively, using the same sample processing techniques that are applied to unknown samples. This approach can be validated by measuring secondary standards of similar size and C-14 composition to the unknown samples. Ordinary sample processing (such as ABA or leaching pretreatment, combustion/graphitization, and handling) introduces MC contamination of similar to 0.6 +/- 0.3 mu g C, while DC is similar to 0.3 +/- 0.15 mu g C. Today, the laboratory routinely analyzes graphite samples as small as 0.015 mg C for external submissions and congruent to 0.001 mg C for internal research activities with a precision of similar to 1% for similar to 0.010 mg C. However, when analyzing ultra-small samples isolated by a series of complex chemical and chromatographic methods (such as individual compounds), integrated procedural blanks may be far larger and more variable than those associated with combustion/graphitization alone. In some instances, the mass ratio of these blanks to the compounds of interest may be so high that the reported C-14 results are meaningless. Thus, the abundance and variability of both MC and DC contamination encountered during ultra-small sample analysis must be carefully and thoroughly evaluated. Four case studies are presented to illustrate how extraction chemistry blanks are determined.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2010
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: Other: BGC1437
DOI: 10.1017/S0033822200046415
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Radiocarbon
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: New Haven : American journal of science
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 52 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1322 - 1335 Identifier: CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/991042724398366
ISSN: 0033-8222