Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: Bouncing ball meets metronome

Hove, M. J., Iversen, J. R., Zhang, A., & Repp, B. H. (2013). Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: Bouncing ball meets metronome. Psychological Research, 77(4), 388-398. doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0441-0.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Hove_2012_Synchronization.pdf (Preprint), 441KB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
Hove_2012_Synchronization.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Privat
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Hove, Michael J.1, Autor           
Iversen, John R.2, Autor
Zhang, Allen3, Autor
Repp, Bruno H.4, Autor
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Research Group Music Cognition and Action, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634555              
2The Neurosciences Institute, San Diego, CA, USA, ou_persistent22              
3Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA, ou_persistent22              
4Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Synchronization of finger taps with periodically flashing visual stimuli is known to be much more variable than synchronization with an auditory metronome. When one of these rhythms is the synchronization target and the other serves as a distracter at various temporal offsets, strong auditory dominance is observed. However, it has recently been shown that visuomotor synchronization improves substantially with moving stimuli such as a continuously bouncing ball. The present study pitted a bouncing ball against an auditory metronome in a target–distracter synchronization paradigm, with the participants being auditory experts (musicians) and visual experts (video gamers and ball players). Synchronization was still less variable with auditory than with visual target stimuli in both groups. For musicians, auditory stimuli tended to be more distracting than visual stimuli, whereas the opposite was the case for the visual experts. Overall, there was no main effect of distracter modality. Thus, a distracting spatiotemporal visual rhythm can be as effective as a distracting auditory rhythm in its capacity to perturb synchronous movement, but its effectiveness also depends on modality-specific expertise.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2012-02-022012-05-112012-05-262013-07
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0441-0
PMID: 22638726
Anderer: Epub 2012
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Psychological Research
  Andere : Psychol. Res.-Psychol. Forsch.
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Berlin : Springer-Verlag
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 77 (4) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 388 - 398 Identifikator: ISSN: 0340-0727
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925518603