English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Comment on "Identification of low order manifolds: Validating the algorithm of Maas and Pope" [Chaos 9, 108–123 (1999)]

Flockerzi, D., & Heineken, W. (2006). Comment on "Identification of low order manifolds: Validating the algorithm of Maas and Pope" [Chaos 9, 108–123 (1999)]. Chaos, 16(4), 048101. doi:10.1063/1.2357332.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-9B36-7 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0025-BCF4-7
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Flockerzi, D.1, Author              
Heineken, Wolfram2, Author              
Affiliations:
1Systems and Control Theory, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Max Planck Society, ou_1738154              
2Process Systems Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Max Planck Society, ou_1738151              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In [7] it is claimed by Rhodes, Morari and Wiggins that the projection algorithm of Maas and Pope [6] identifies the slow invariant manifold of a system of ordinary differential equations with time scale separation. A transformation to Fenichel normal form serves as a tool to prove this statement. Furthermore in [7] it is conjectured that away from a slow manifold the criterion of Maas and Pope will never be fulfilled. We present two examples that refute the assertions of Rhodes, Morari and Wiggins. In the first example the algorithm of Maas and Pope leads to a manifold that is not invariant but close to a slow invariant manifold. The claim of Rhodes, Morari and Wiggins that the Maas and Pope projection algorithm is invariant under a coordinate transformation to Fenichel normal form is shown to be not correct in this case. In the second example the projection algorithm of Maas and Pope leads to a manifold that lies in a region where no slow manifold exists at all. This rejects the conjecture in [7] mentioned above. © 2006 American Institute of Physics [accessed 2013 August 16th]

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2006
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 298620
DOI: 10.1063/1.2357332
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Chaos
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 16 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 048101 Identifier: -