English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Interactions between apparent motion rivalry in vision and touch

Conrad, V., Vitello, M., & Noppeney, U. (2012). Interactions between apparent motion rivalry in vision and touch. Seeing and Perceiving, 25(0), 26-27.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-B6FC-4 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-C7B7-B
Genre: Meeting Abstract

Files

show Files

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Conrad, V1, 2, 3, Author              
Vitello, MP1, 2, Author              
Noppeney, U2, 3, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              
3Research Group Cognitive Neuroimaging, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497804              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Introduction In multistable perception, the brain alternates between several perceptual explanations of ambiguous sensory signals. Recent studies have demonstrated crossmodal interactions between ambiguous and unambiguous signals. However it is currently unknown whether multiple bistable processes can interact across the senses. [1, 2] Using the apparent motion quartet in vision and touch, this study investigated whether bistable perceptual processes for vision and touch are independent or influence each other when powerful cues of congruency are provided to facilitate visuotactile integration. [3] Methods When two visual flashes and/or tactile vibration pulses are presented alternately along the two diagonals of the rectangle, subjects’ percept vacillates between vertical and horizontal apparent motion in the visual and/or tactile modalities [4]. Observers were presented with unisensory (visual/tactile), visuotactile spatially congruent and incongruent apparent motion quartets and reported their visual or tactile percepts. Results Congruent stimulation induced pronounced visuotactile interactions as indicated by increased dominance times and -bias for the percept already dominant under unisensory stimulation. Yet, the temporal dynamics did not converge for congruent stimulation. It depended also on subjects’ attentional focus and was generally slower for tactile than visual reports. Conclusion Our results support Bayesian approaches to perceptual inference, where the probability of a perceptual interpretation is determined by combining a modality-specific prior with incoming visual and/or tactile evidence. Under congruent stimulation, joint evidence from both senses decelerates the rivalry dynamics by stabilizing the more likely perceptual interpretation. Importantly, the perceptual stabilization was specific to spatiotemporally congruent visuotactile stimulation indicating multisensory rather than cognitive bias mechanisms.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2012-06
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1163/187847612X646497
BibTex Citekey: ConradVN2012_2
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: 13th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF 2012)
Place of Event: Oxford, UK
Start-/End Date: -

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Seeing and Perceiving
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 25 (0) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 26 - 27 Identifier: -