English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Mapping human brain function: a comparison between Variational Bayes Techniques and LCMV Beamformer

Belardinelli, P., Ortiz, E., Barnes, G., Noppeney, U., & Preissl, H. (2011). Mapping human brain function: a comparison between Variational Bayes Techniques and LCMV Beamformer. Poster presented at 17th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (HBM 2011), Québec City, Canada.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-BB8C-3 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-10E9-2
Genre: Poster

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
HBM-2011-Noppeney.pdf (Abstract), 365KB
Name:
HBM-2011-Noppeney.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Belardinelli, P, Author
Ortiz, E, Author
Barnes, G, Author
Noppeney, U1, 2, Author              
Preissl, H, Author              
Affiliations:
1Research Group Cognitive Neuroimaging, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497804              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In the last years several hierarchical Bayesian approaches to the MEG/EEG inverse problem have provided for a relevant contribution to the field of MEG/EEG source localization (Friston et al., 2008b; Wipf et al., 2010). While several methods show applicability under specific conditions, none is optimal without prior information. Meaningful results are bound to previously acquired information. In this work we used simulated MEG data to compare three Variational Bayes reconstruction algorithms implemented within the SPM software preprocessing framework (available from http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/): two approaches involving the search for optimal mixtures of anatomically defined priors (Greedy Search (GS) and Automatic Relevance Determination (ARD)) (Friston et al., 2008a) and a third approach using a single empirical prior based on the well established LCMV Beamformer technique (Van Veen et al., 1997), that we denominated Empirical Bayes Beamformer (EBB). Our parameters of interest were: 1. Number of simulated dipoles (1 to 3), 2. Relative position between dipoles (bilaterally symmetric versus random locations) 3. Dipole time-course correlation level (high/low). Each parameter configuration set was tested with 5 levels of SNR (from -30 to +10 dB) and 50 dipole position sets.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2011-06
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: BibTex Citekey: BelardinelliOBNP2011
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: 17th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (HBM 2011)
Place of Event: Québec City, Canada
Start-/End Date: 2011-06-26 - 2011-06-30

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: 17th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (HBM 2011)
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: 665 Start / End Page: - Identifier: -