English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Pattern recognition methods in classifying fMRI data

Ku, S.-P., Gretton, A., Macke, J., & Logothetis, N. (2008). Pattern recognition methods in classifying fMRI data. In 9th Conference of the Junior Neuroscientists of Tübingen (NeNa 2008) (pp. 11).

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-C6F3-6 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-A157-5
Genre: Meeting Abstract

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ku, S-P1, 2, Author              
Gretton, A2, 3, Author              
Macke, J2, 4, Author              
Logothetis, NK1, 2, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497798              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              
3Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497795              
4Research Group Computational Vision and Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497805              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Pattern recognition methods have shown that fMRI data can reveal signicant information about brain activity. For example, in the debate of how object categories are represented in the brain, multivariate analysis has been used to provide evidence of a distributed encoding scheme. Many follow up studies have employed dierent methods to analyze human fMRI data with varying degrees of success. In this presentation I would like to discuss and compare four popular pattern recognition methods: correlation analysis, support vector machines (SVM), linear discriminant analysis and Gaussian nave Bayes (GNB), using data collected at high eld (7T) with higher resolution than usual fMRI studies. We investigate prediction performance on single trials and for averages across varying numbers of stimulus presentations. The performance of the various algorithms depends on the nature of the brain activity being categorized: for several tasks, many of the methods work well, whereas for others, no methods perform above chance level. An important factor in overall classication performance is careful preprocessing of the data, including dimensionality reduction, voxel selection, and outlier elimination.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2008-10
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: BibTex Citekey: KuGML2008
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: 9th Conference of the Junior Neuroscientists of Tübingen (NeNa 2008)
Place of Event: Ellwangen, Germany
Start-/End Date: 2008-10-27 - 2008-10-29

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: 9th Conference of the Junior Neuroscientists of Tübingen (NeNa 2008)
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 11 Identifier: -