English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Amodal Multimodal Integration

Ernst, M., Di Luca, M., & Adams, W. (2008). Amodal Multimodal Integration. In 9th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF 2008) (pp. 285).

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ernst, MO1, 2, Author              
Di Luca, M1, 2, 3, Author              
Adams, W, Author
Affiliations:
1Research Group Multisensory Perception and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497806              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              
3Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Recently it has been shown that congruent visual and haptic signals are integrated in a statistically optimal fashion. Spatial separation between the signals can preclude this integration. Here we investigate whether optimal integration occurs between an amodally completed visual stimulus and its haptic counterpart. Thus, we ask whether integration occurs despite the sensory information not being derived from the same spatial location. This may indicate that subjects inferred that the visually specified parts of the stimulus and the haptic information have a common cause and thus should be integrated. The visual stimulus was a disparity-defined bar that was partially occluded (amodal completion condition). The bar could also be touched behind the occluder using two fingers. Subjects' task was to discriminate the size of two successively presented bars using a 2-IFC paradigm, where one interval contained conflicting haptic and visual information. Performance in the amodal completion condition was not different from a condition in which the occluder was removed (visual-haptic condition). Both conditions were consistent with an optimal integration strategy. More interestingly, integration deviated from optimality when we introduced a slight modification to the visual stimulus – small gaps between the bar and the occluder (gap condition). This manipulation interfered with the amodal completion process and consequently subjects relied almost completely on the haptic information for discriminating the size of the bars. These findings suggest that visual and haptic information can be combined optimally even when visual information is not directly specified by sensory information, but results from amodal completion. In conclusion, it seems that the perceptual system determines when to combine visual and haptic information based on the likelihood the signals have of belonging to the same object (i.e. if there is a causal relationship between the signals) and not only on signal co-location.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2008-07
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: URI: http://imrf.mcmaster.ca/IMRF/2008/pdf/FullProgramIMRF08.pdf
BibTex Citekey: 5173
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: 9th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF 2008)
Place of Event: Hamburg, Germany
Start-/End Date: 2008-07-16 - 2008-07-19

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: 9th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF 2008)
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 285 Identifier: -