Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Learning Inverse Dynamics: A Comparison

Nguyen-Tuong, D., Peters, J., Seeger, M., & Schölkopf, B. (2008). Learning Inverse Dynamics: A Comparison. In M. Verleysen (Ed.), Advances in computational intelligence and learning: 16th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 13-18). Evere, Belgium: d-side.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
ESANN-2008-Nguyen-Tuong.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 671KB
Name:
ESANN-2008-Nguyen-Tuong.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Nguyen-Tuong, D1, 2, Autor           
Peters, J1, 2, Autor           
Seeger, M1, 2, Autor           
Schölkopf, B1, 2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497795              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: While it is well-known that model can enhance the control performance in terms of precision or energy efficiency, the practical application
has often been limited by the complexities of manually obtaining
sufficiently accurate models. In the past, learning has proven a viable alternative
to using a combination of rigid-body dynamics and handcrafted
approximations of nonlinearities. However, a major open question is what
nonparametric learning method is suited best for learning dynamics? Traditionally,
locally weighted projection regression (LWPR), has been the
standard method as it is capable of online, real-time learning for very complex
robots. However, while LWPR has had significant impact on learning
in robotics, alternative nonparametric regression methods such as support
vector regression (SVR) and Gaussian processes regression (GPR) offer interesting alternatives with fewer open parameters and potentially higher
accuracy. In this paper, we evaluate these three alternatives for model
learning. Our comparison consists out of the evaluation of learning quality
for each regression method using original data from SARCOS robot
arm, as well as the robot tracking performance employing learned models.
The results show that GPR and SVR achieve a superior learning precision
and can be applied for real-time control obtaining higher accuracy. However,
for the online learning LWPR presents the better method due to its
lower computational requirements.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2008-04
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: BibTex Citekey: 4936
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: 16th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN 2008)
Veranstaltungsort: Bruges, Belgium
Start-/Enddatum: 2008-04-23 - 2008-04-25

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Advances in computational intelligence and learning: 16th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks
Genre der Quelle: Konferenzband
 Urheber:
Verleysen, M, Herausgeber
Affiliations:
-
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Evere, Belgium : d-side
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 13 - 18 Identifikator: -