English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling

Wichmann, F., & Hill, N. (2001). The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception and Psychophysics, 63 (8), 1314-1329. doi:10.3758/bf03194545.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E354-D Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-A73D-B
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Wichmann, FA1, Author              
Hill, NJ1, Author              
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The psychometric function relates an observer’s performance to an independent variable, usually a physical quantity of an experimental stimulus. Even if a model is successfully fit to the data and its goodness of fit is acceptable, experimenters require an estimate of the variability of the parameters to assess whether differences across conditions are significant. Accurate estimates of variability are difficult to obtain, however, given the typically small size of psychophysical data sets: Traditional statistical techniques are only asymptotically correct and can be shown to be unreliable in some common situations. Here and in our companion paper (Wichmann & Hill, 2001), we suggest alternative statistical techniques based on Monte Carlo resampling methods. The present paper’s principal topic is the estimation of the variability of fitted parameters and derived quantities, such as thresholds and slopes. First, we outline the basic bootstrap procedure and argue in favor of the parametric, as opposed to the nonparametric, bootstrap. Second, we describe how the bootstrap bridging assumption, on which the validity of the procedure depends, can be tested. Third, we show how one’s choice of sampling scheme (the placement of sample points on the stimulus axis) strongly affects the reliability of bootstrap confidence intervals, and we make recommendations on how to sample the psychometric function efficiently. Fourth, we show that, under certain circumstances, the (arbitrary) choice of the distribution function can exert an unwanted influence on the size of the bootstrap confidence intervals obtained, and we make recommendations on how to avoid this influence. Finally, we introduce improved confidence intervals (bias corrected and accelerated) that improve on the parametric and percentile-based bootstrap confidence intervals previously used. Software implementing our methods is available.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2001-11
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: BibTex Citekey: 943
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194545
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Perception and Psychophysics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Austin, Tex., etc. : Psychonomic Society, etc.
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 63 (8) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1314 - 1329 Identifier: ISSN: 0031-5117
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925432372