English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  View-based vs. place-based navigation: What is recognized in recognition-triggered responses?

Mallot, H., & Gillner, S.(1998). View-based vs. place-based navigation: What is recognized in recognition-triggered responses? (64). Tübingen, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-E7EB-C Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-8E47-F
Genre: Report

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
MPIK-TR-64.pdf (Publisher version), 434KB
Name:
MPIK-TR-64.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mallot, HA1, 2, Author              
Gillner, S, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The usage of landmark information in a route navigation task is investigated in a virtual environment. After learning a route, subjects were released at intermediate points along the route and asked to indicate the next movement direction required to continue the route. At each decision point, three landmarks were present, one of which was viewed centrally and two which appeared in the periphery of the visual field when approaching the decision point. Replacement of the landmarks in the test phase did not affect subjects' performance as long as the direction informations associated with each landmark and landmark position (left, central, right) during the learning phase were consistent. Only if landmarks were combined that carried conflicting movement informations, a reduced performance is observed. We conclude that local views and objects are recognized individually and that the associated directions are combined in a voting scheme. No evidence was found for a recognition of places as panoramic views or configurations of objects.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 1998-10
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: 12
 Publishing info: Tübingen, Germany : Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: Report Nr.: 64
BibTex Citekey: 1532
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 64 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -