English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Why Did Austrian Business Oppose Welfare Cuts? How the Organization of Interests Shapes Business Attitudes Toward Social Partnership

Paster, T. (2014). Why Did Austrian Business Oppose Welfare Cuts? How the Organization of Interests Shapes Business Attitudes Toward Social Partnership. Comparative Political Studies, 47(7), 966-992. doi:10.1177/0010414013488556.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
CPS_47_2014_Paster.pdf (Any fulltext), 814KB
Name:
CPS_47_2014_Paster.pdf
Description:
Full text open access
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
Abstract
Locator:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488556 (Publisher version)
Description:
Full text via publisher

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Paster, Thomas1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Institutioneller Wandel im gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214549              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: business interest associations; employers; social policy; pensions; corporatism; social partnership; institutional change
 Abstract: In recent decades, business interests became protagonists of welfare retrenchment in many countries. In contrast, Austria’s national business organization, the WKÖ (Wirtschaftskammer Österreich), defended welfare programs and social partnership against government initiatives to dismantle them. Drawing on interviews and media reports, this article analyzes the reasons for this deviation, focusing on reforms in two fields: (a) public pensions and (b) social insurance administration. The article suggests that the institutional setup of interest representation in Austria explains this stance better than alternative explanations that focus on competitive advantages. The article identifies compulsory membership, equal voting rights, and encompassing organization as the relevant features of the institutional setup. These features shaped the WKÖ’s social policy attitudes in two ways: first, by ensuring a strong role for small firms, and second, by reducing the vulnerability of the organization to discontented minorities. The findings point to the importance of organizational structures in shaping associational policy preferences.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2013-06-252014
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1177/0010414013488556
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Comparative Political Studies
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 47 (7) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 966 - 992 Identifier: ISSN: 0010-4140
ISSN: 1552-3829