English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Neurophysiological evidence for morphological underspecification in German strong adjective inflection

Opitz, A., Regel, S., Müller, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2013). Neurophysiological evidence for morphological underspecification in German strong adjective inflection. Language, 89(2), 231-264. doi:10.1353/lan.2013.0033.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-1736-F Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-B637-1
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Opitz_NeurophysiologicalEvidence.pdf (Publisher version), 568KB
Name:
Opitz_NeurophysiologicalEvidence.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Online supplementary materials (Supplementary material)
Description:
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2013.0035

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Opitz, Andreas1, Author
Regel, Stefanie2, Author              
Müller, Gereon1, Author
Friederici, Angela D.2, Author              
Affiliations:
1University of Leipzig, Germany, ou_persistent22              
2Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Underspecification; Event-related potential (ERP); Left anterior negativity (LAN); Distributed morphology; Syncretism; Gender; Subset (elsewhere, blocking, Pānnini's) principle
 Abstract: In the present study we investigate the relevance of the concept of underspecified inflection markers for the processing of language in the human brain. Underspecification is recognized as the main source of syncretism in many current morphological theories. However, relatively little is known about its cognitive status. In underspecification-based theories, a competition among morphological exponents arises systematically. In order to win such a competition, an inflection marker has to meet two requirements: COMPATIBILITY and SPECIFICITY . If underspecification is real, these two principles should also be an inherent part of the language processing system. One should therefore be able to observe separable effects for the violation of each of the criteria. We used the event-related potential (ERP) violation paradigm to test this hypothesis in the domain of strong adjective inflection in German. We expected differences in brain potentials between two incorrect conditions whenever they represented different types of violation (of compatibility and specificity). Our findings strongly support underspecification: an ERP-component related to morphosyntactic integration (viz. left anterior negativity; LAN) was modulated by violations of specificity versus compatibility. Furthermore, the neurophysiological evidence helps to distinguish between two kinds of morphological underspecification that have been proposed: it argues for maximal rather than minimal underspecification. Finally, the observed brain responses indicate increased processing demands for highly specific markers, which suggests that LAN effects may be sensitive not only to morphosyntactic violations but also to the degree of processing effort.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2013-06
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1353/lan.2013.0033
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Washington, DC [etc.] : Linguistic Society of America [etc.]
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 89 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 231 - 264 Identifier: ISSN: 0097-8507
CoNE: /journals/resource/954925466254