Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse
  1. Datensatz Übersicht / 
  2. Datensatz ansehen

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
 Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht
  Should We Clash or Should I Go? The Impact of Low Wage and Bad Working Conditions on the Exit–Voice Trade-off

Godechot, O., & Salibekyan, Z. (2013). Should We Clash or Should I Go? The Impact of Low Wage and Bad Working Conditions on the Exit–Voice Trade-off. MaxPo Discussion Paper, 13/3.

Item is

 

einblenden: alle ausblenden: alle

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Datensatz-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-A720-1 Versions-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-E2DD-F
Genre: Forschungspapier

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
mpifg_mpdp13_3.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 487KB
Öffnen   Speichern
Datei-Permalink:
https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-A722-E
Name:
mpifg_mpdp13_3.pdf
Beschreibung:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Öffnen
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
http://www.maxpo.eu/pub/maxpo_dp/maxpodp13-3.pdf (beliebiger Volltext)
Beschreibung:
Full text
OA-Status:
externe Referenz:
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-ABB9-C (Ergänzendes Material)
Beschreibung:
New source: Godechot, Olivier, & Salibekyan, Zinaida (2019). Should We Clash or Should I Go? The Impact of Low Wage and Poor Working Conditions on the Exit-Voice Trade-Off. Labour, (published online May 14). doi:10.1111/labr.12155.
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Godechot, Olivier1, 2, Autor           
Salibekyan, Zinaida3, 4, Autor
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies (MaxPo), Max Planck Society, ou_1631137              
2Assoziierte Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_2074316              
3Institute of Labour Economics and Industrial Sociology (LEST–CNRS), Paris, France, ou_persistent22              
4University of Aix-Marseille, France, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Although Hirschman’s exit–voice theoretical model has been applied to labor markets,
research up to now has not tested one of its most important features: the impact of job
quality on exit–voice strategies. Hirschman’s model of consumer behavior explains that
those individuals unsatisfied with a product’s quality are more likely to “voice,” whereas
those more concerned with its price are more likely to “exit.” A rationale for this tradeoff
is based on information: first, information on the price of alternative options is
much more accessible than information on quality; second, voice produces more information
than exit and favors opportunities for specific improvements. We transpose
Hirschman’s assumptions to labor markets and use the French SalSa survey and DADS,
declaration by employers on social data, to examine the conditions under which French
employees are more likely to exit, and the conditions under which they are more likely
to voice. Our results support the Hirschmanian hypothesis. A deterioration by one unit
in our working-conditions index increases the probability of participation in collective
action by 5 percentage points. An increase in log hourly wage by one unit decreases the probability of quitting by 5 percentage points.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2013-032013
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: IV, 27
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Paris : MaxPo
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: Introduction
Previous research
Theoretical background
Workers coping with bad working conditions
Workers coping with low pay
Data and method
Data
Strategy variables
Bad quality of work
Pay
Other control variables
Results
Bad quality and strategies
Pay and strategy
Strategy and improvements
Discussion and conclusion
References
Appendix
 Art der Begutachtung: Interne Begutachtung
 Identifikatoren: -
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: MaxPo Discussion Paper
Genre der Quelle: Reihe
 Urheber:
Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies (MaxPo), MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, Herausgeber              
Affiliations:
-
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 13/3 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 2196-6508
ISSN: 2197-3075