English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Dorsomedial striatum involvement in regulating conflict between current and presumed outcomes

Mestres-Misse, A., Bazin, P.-L., Trampel, R., Turner, R., & Kotz, S. A. (2014). Dorsomedial striatum involvement in regulating conflict between current and presumed outcomes. NeuroImage, 98, 159-167. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.002.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0024-2C1F-5 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-7EFB-6
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mestres-Misse, Anna1, 2, Author              
Bazin, Pierre-Louis3, 4, Author              
Trampel, Robert3, Author              
Turner, Robert3, Author              
Kotz, Sonja A.1, 2, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634551              
2School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom, ou_persistent22              
3Department Neurophysics, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634550              
4Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, Leipzig, DE, ou_634549              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Cognitive control; Conflict; 7 T-fMRI; Ambiguity; Striatum
 Abstract: The balance between automatic and controlled processing is essential to human flexible but optimal behavior. On the one hand, the automation of habitual behavior and processing is indispensable, and, on the other hand, strategic processing is needed in light of unexpected, conflicting, or new situations. Using ultra-high-field high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (7 T-fMRI), the present study examined the role of subcortical structures in mediating this balance. Participants were asked to judge the congruency of sentences containing a semantically ambiguous or unambiguous word. Ambiguous sentences had three possible resolutions: dominant meaning, subordinate meaning, and incongruent. The dominant interpretation represents the most habitual response, whereas both the subordinate and incongruent options clash with this automatic response, and, hence, require cognitive control. Moreover, the subordinate resolution entails a less expected but correct outcome, while the incongruent condition is simply wrong. The current results reveal the involvement of the anterior dorsomedial striatum in modulating and resolving conflict between actual and expected outcomes, and highlight the importance of cortical and subcortical cooperation in this process.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2013-05-032014-05-112014-09-01
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.002
PMID: 24825503
Other: Epub 2014
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: NeuroImage
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 98 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 159 - 167 Identifier: ISSN: 1053-8119
CoNE: /journals/resource/954922650166